The Impact of Local Ablative Therapies as Bridging Treatment on Overall Survival Following Liver Transplantation in...

The use of neoadjuvant therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation has gained increasing popularity in recent years. To date, there are only limited data investigating the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on post-transplant survival.

In this retrospective study, we evaluated patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent deceased donor or living donor liver transplantation at Jena University Hospital between 2019 and 2023. Comprehensive clinical and pathological variables were systematically analyzed, including correlations between neoadjuvant therapy use, tumor burden and overall survival. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

A total of 107 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 90 received neoadjuvant therapy prior to transplantation. Treatment modalities comprised SIRT, TACE, liver resection and combined SIRT and TACE. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates following transplantation were 93.5%, 82.2%, and 79.4%, respectively. Recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91.6%, 85.0%, and 83.2%, respectively. Among the various neoadjuvant strategies, SIRT and TACE yielded the highest OS rates. Patients listed outside the transplantation criteria (Milan, UCSF, up-to-seven) at the time of initial diagnosis who underwent SIRT had significantly better OS than those outside the criteria who underwent TACE. In contrast, among patients within the Milan, UCSF and up-to-seven criteria, TACE was associated with superior OS compared with SIRT.

The use of neoadjuvant therapies confers a significant survival benefit following liver transplantation in patients with HCC. TACE appears to be most suitable for patients listed within established transplantation criteria, who consequently have a lower tumor burden. In contrast, SIRT is more beneficial for patients with a higher tumor burden and those beyond standard transplantation criteria. A limitation of our study, however, is that the included SIRT cohort comprised only 24 patients, and TACE was preferentially performed in patients with a lower tumor burden, which means that a selection bias cannot be fully excluded. Overall, further studies are required to define the optimal bridging strategies.