Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

645
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
645
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

382
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
382
Outliers and Influential Points01:08

Outliers and Influential Points

6.0K
An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the...
6.0K
Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

7.6K
Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gallstone disease classification using SLOA-optimized CatBoost classifier with explainable AI.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Multi-Objective AI Optimization of Plastic Waste Pyrolysis Integrating Energy Return on Investment for Circular Polymer Recycling.

Polymers·2026
Same author

Quad-Element Implantable MIMO Antenna for Wireless Capsule Endoscopy.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

A wideband slot antenna for RF energy harvesting.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A Systematic Review of Multimodal Frameworks for Assessing Health Vulnerability in Academicians Across Ergonomic, Lifestyle, and Dietary Domains.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Diabetes Prediction Using Feature Selection Algorithms and Boosting-Based Machine Learning Classifiers.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same journal

Correction: Komatsu et al. Three-Dimensional Visualization and Detection of the Pulmonary Venous-Left Atrium Connection Using Artificial Intelligence in Fetal Cardiac Ultrasound Screening. <i>Bioengineering</i> 2026, <i>13</i>, 100.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Comparison of CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Microdebrider in the Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Retrospective Analysis.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Toward More Translational Tumor Models: Breast dECM-Based 3D Systems Capture Native Microenvironmental Cues.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Postural Stability Changes During the 4 Phases of the Half Squat: Kinematics Profile of the Center of Pressure and Center of Mass in High-Performance Weightlifters-A Pilot Study.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Definite Implant Position as Novel Readout for Effectiveness of Ridge Preservation Indicates to Beneficial Effect of Combined Treatment with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Xenogenic Biomaterial in Bone Regeneration.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Trueness and Precision of Intraoral Scanners for 3D-Printed Orthodontic Models with Attachments: An In Vitro Comparative Study.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.6K

Breast Cancer Prediction Using Rotation Forest Algorithm Along with Finding the Influential Causes.

Prosenjit Das1, Proshenjit Sarker1, Jun-Jiat Tiang2

  • 1Electronics and Communication Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study used machine learning to classify breast cancer (BC) cases. The hard voting strategy with optimized Rotation Forest achieved 85.71% accuracy, identifying BMI and Glucose as key predictive features.

Keywords:
Optunabreast cancercounterfactual analysisensemble voting classifierrotation forestwrapper method

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.1K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.6K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.1K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Breast cancer (BC) is a significant global health concern, primarily affecting women.
  • Early detection and accurate classification are crucial for improving patient outcomes.
  • Machine learning offers promising avenues for enhancing BC diagnosis and risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To classify breast cancer (BC) versus non-BC cases using machine learning.
  • To optimize classifier performance and feature selection for improved diagnostic accuracy.
  • To identify key influential features for BC classification using counterfactual explanations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Rotation Forest classifier with hyperparameters optimized by the Optuna optimizer.
  • Employed Sequential Forward Selection, Sequential Backward Selection, and Exhaustive Feature Selection for feature selection.
  • Developed an ensemble model with soft and hard voting strategies for classification.

Main Results:

  • The hard voting strategy achieved superior performance with 85.71% accuracy, 83.87% F1-score, 92.85% precision, and 76.47% recall.
  • The soft voting strategy yielded 80.00% accuracy, 77.42% F1-score, 85.71% precision, and 70.59% recall.
  • Diverse Counterfactual Explanations identified BMI and Glucose as highly influential features, while HOMA, Adiponectin, and Resistin showed minimal impact.

Conclusions:

  • The optimized Rotation Forest classifier with a hard voting ensemble significantly improves breast cancer classification accuracy.
  • BMI and Glucose levels are critical indicators for predicting breast cancer, highlighting their importance in clinical assessment.
  • Feature selection and hyperparameter optimization are essential for maximizing the effectiveness of machine learning models in oncology.