Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Preclinical Assessment of the Bioactivity of the Anticancer Coumarin OT48 by Spheroids, Colony Formation Assays, and Zebrafish Xenografts
Published on: June 26, 2018
Cytotoxicity of Mimusops caffra-Based Ursolic Acid, Oleanolic Acid and Derivatives Against Human Cancerous and
Sithenkosi Mlala1, Opeoluwa Oyehan Oyedeji1, Gbemisola Morounke Saibu2
1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa.
Abstract:
According to the World Health Organization, cancer is still the leading cause of death for humans worldwide. Although over 100 chemotherapeutic agents are currently available for the treatment of cancer patients, the overall long term clinical benefit is disappointing due to the lack of effectiveness or severe side effects from these drugs. The use of complementary and alternative medicinal products from plants has continued to increase in past decades, due to fewer side effects of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants of which pentacyclic triterpenoids have been identified as one class of secondary metabolites that could play an important role in the treatment and management of a number of non-communicable diseases. The main aim of this study is to extract, isolate, identify, and elucidate pentacyclic triterpenoid (ursolic acid, UA (1), and oleanolic acid, OA (2)) from Mimusops caffra. Semi-synthesis of UA was carried out to obtain some triterpenoid derivatives (3-O-acetyl ursolic acid, AUA (3), ursolic-28-methylate, UM (4), and 3-acetylursolic-methylate, AUM (5)), and we evaluated these compounds as anti-cancer therapeutic agents. Isolation of ursolic acid (UA) (1) from M. caffra is always accompanied by its isomer oleanolic acid (OA) (2) due to their similar retention factors (Rf) values. Acetylation and deacetylation techniques were used to isolate compounds 1 and 2. In vitro cytotoxicity activities of UA, AUA UM, and AUM were evaluated against various cancer cell lines, such as human breast adenocarcinoma cancer cell lines (MDA), human liver cancer cell lines (HepG2), human prostate cancer cell lines (PC3) and non-cancerous human fibroblast cell lines (KMST-6) using MTT assays. The UM exhibited remarkable cytotoxic activities against cancer cells, while little or no activities were observed on non-cancerous cell lines, which indicates that the addition of methyl at C-28 of UA is essential to enhance its activity as a therapeutic agent for cancer. The AUA showed moderate or no cytotoxicity against the different cancer cell lines, which is less than that of the UA parent compound. Moreover, these results suggest that ursolic acid and UA derivatives are potential therapeutic drugs for human breast, liver, and prostate cancers.
More Related Videos
09:57Real Time Detection of In Vitro Tumor Cell Apoptosis Induced by CD8+ T Cells to Study Immune Suppressive Functions of Tumor-infiltrating Myeloid Cells
Published on: January 29, 2019
07:58An Automated Differential Nuclear Staining Assay for Accurate Determination of Mitocan Cytotoxicity
Published on: May 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
What is Cancer?
Although people have known about cancer for centuries, it was only in 1761 that Giovanni Morgagni of Padua performed a detailed autopsy of...