Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Predictive Value of Quantitative ADC, SUVmax, and the SUVmax/ADC Ratio for Biological Behavior and Prognosis in
Abdullah Enes Ataş1, Ülkü Kerimoğlu1, Zeki İlhan2
1Department of Radiology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya 42090, Türkiye.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: To investigate the importance of ADC, SUVmax, and SUVmax/ADC values in the prognosis and biological behavior of prostate cancer. Methods: In this retrospective study, ADC measurements in diffusion MRI were made by two radiologists by correlating the lesions with the highest SUVmax value from Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT examinations of 81 patients with prostate cancer. The quantitative values were compared with histopathological grade, presence of perineural invasion, and lymph node and bone metastasis. Results: For D'Amico high-risk patients, a statistically significant difference among the ADC, SUVmax, and SUVmax/ADC measurements was reported (p < 0.001). Cut-off values were defined as 0.52 (×10-3 mm2/s) for ADC, 9.73 for SUVmax, and 20.28 for the SUVmax/ADC ratio (AUC = 0.887, 0.747, 0.817, respectively) for the high-risk categories. The Youden indices were 0.643, 0.405, and 0.437, respectively. In logistic regression, the SUVmax/ADC ratio was a significant predictor of the high-risk group (AUC = 0.844, p = 0.002), demonstrating superior performance to a model with individual ADC and SUVmax values (AUC = 0.796, p = 0.006). For the advanced-grade group, the SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC ratios differed significantly (p < 0.001). The CAPRA score showed significant correlations with all imaging biomarkers: negatively with ADC (rho = -0.456, p < 0.001) and positively with SUVmax (rho = 0.359, p = 0.001) and the SUVmax/ADC ratio (rho = 0.441, p < 0.001). The presence of perineural invasion had no significant correlation with any of the variables (p > 0.05). The presence of bone metastases and PSA and free PSA levels differed significantly (p = 0.003, p = 0.001, respectively). In the presence of lymph node metastasis, SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC ratios were found to be significant (p = 0.019, p = 0.01, respectively). In the survival (OS) analysis, a low ADC value was found to be associated with shorter survival (median OS: 61 vs. 106 months). Conclusions: Among advanced-grade and high-risk prostate cancer patients, ADC, SUVmax, and SUVmax/ADC values can be employed as alternative prognostic factors for predicting the biological behavior of the disease.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
13:19Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot