Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Application of Light-cured Dental Adhesive Resin for Mounting Electrodes or Microdialysis Probes in Chronic Experiments
Published on: July 30, 2007
Time-Dependent Adhesion and Fluoride Release of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements on Demineralized Enamel, Sound
Pilar Cereceda-Villaescusa1, Pilar Valverde-Rubio2, Inmaculada Cabello3
1Department of Integrated Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Abstract:
Background: The treatment of cavitated lesions has evolved with minimally invasive dentistry (MID), whereby we can leave demineralized enamel that could potentially be remineralizable with the use of materials such as resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) that allow these lesions to be repaired and remineralized while removing less tooth tissue. The aim of our study was to compare the influence of aging on adhesion to sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and the healthy dentin of five RMGICs (Vitremer®, ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, Riva LC, Ionolux®, and GC Fuji II LC) and fluoride release. There are currently no studies on adhesion in demineralized enamel. Method: A total of 1035 bovine incisors were analyzed in 45 groups of 23 teeth each. The groups were established based on three factors: time (24 h, 1 month, and 3 months); substrate (sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and healthy dentin); and type of material. In each group, 20 samples underwent shear bond strength (SBS) and fracture type analysis. Adhesive interfaces were observed in three samples from each group using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Daily and cumulative fluoride release rates were calculated. Results: Adhesion improved over time on both demineralized and sound enamel. ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative had the highest SBS values (33.63 ± 10.69 MPa), and Vitremer® had the lowest (4.10 ± 4.63). Most fractures were adhesive. Vitremer® and Ionolux® showed the highest daily and cumulative fluoride release rates (Vitremer daily (24 h): 225.30 ± 26.28 ppm/g; Vitremer cumulative (30 days): 635.99 ± 305.38 ppm/g; Ionolux daily (24 h): 207.59 ± 48.43 ppm/g; Ionolux cumulative (30 days): 501.21 ± 138.71 ppm/g) and ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative showed the lowest (ACTIVA daily (24 h): 10.50 ± 0.85; ACTIVA cumulative (30 days): 39.10 ± 2.16). Conclusions: ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative was the material with the best adhesion values on all substrates and at all times, but it showed the lowest fluoride release rates.
Related Concept Videos
Adhesion
Capillary action is a result of water’s adhesive tendencies. When a narrow glass...
Cohesion
On a surface,...
Essential Minerals for Bone Health
Calcium and Phosphorus
Calcium is a critical component of bones, especially in the form of calcium phosphate and calcium carbonate. Since the body cannot make calcium, it must be obtained from the diet. However, calcium cannot be absorbed from the small intestine without...
Efflorescence in Masonry
While initial efflorescence is common post-construction and can be cleaned with water and a brush, in certain instances, efflorescence can reappear and gradually diminish over time as salts are leached out...
Waterproofing and Anti-Bacterial Admixtures in Concrete
Waterproofing admixtures render concrete hydrophobic,...
Air-entraining Agents

