Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
Retrospective Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Volume Changes Following Bone-Anchored Midface Distraction Osteogenesis
Aleksandra Kołodziejska1,2, Patryk Kołodziejski3, Maria Gutowska2
1Division of Orthodontics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Al. Zwycięstwa 42c, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: This study retrospectively evaluated maxillary sinus volume changes and linear changes in the craniofacial region after Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction system. Methods: Ten patients who underwent LeFort 1 distraction osteogenesis between 2012 and 2025 were included in the study. Computed tomography scans and lateral cephalograms were obtained before and 12.3 ± 6.98 months after the surgery. The associated volumes of the maxillary left and right sinuses were subsequently measured using the semiautomatic segmentation method in the ITK-SNAP software. Linear measurements of the sinuses and cephalometric analysis were performed before and after the distraction. Results: The Wits appraisal (distance between perpendicular lines drawn from point A (on the maxilla) and point B (on the mandible) to the occlusal plane) presented an increase of 9.33 mm ± 7.93 mm, corresponding to an increase in the ANB angle by 9.88° ± 5.35°. There were statistically significant increases in the total sinus volume, by 3965 mm3 ± 5456 mm3 (n = 10, p = 0.047), and in the single maxillary sinus volume, by 1983 ± 2889 mm3 (n = 20, p = 0.003). A significant increase in height was also observed, with a mean value of 4.46 ± 2.94 mm (n = 20). Conclusions: Extraoral bone-anchored midface distraction osteogenesis led to increases in single sinus volume, total sinus volume and sinus height in the cleft cohort, resulting in improved maxillary retrusion and profile. However, the study group was small and non-uniform with different follow-up periods, indicating a need for further studies with larger, more homogenous cohorts.

