Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.1K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.1K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

1.4K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intrinsic Dual-Phase Regulated GeSe<sub>2</sub> Nanoparticles Triggered by Ball-Milling Treatment for Photonic Multi-Valued Logic Circuits.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Surveillance for Metastriate Ticks and Spotted Fever Group Rickettsioses in Southern Illinois.

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene·2026
Same author

Habitat Type and Locality Structure the Midgut Microbiota of Aedes albopictus.

Microbial ecology·2026
Same author

Heterogeneous distribution of avian malaria parasites across mosquito species: disproportionate involvement of Culex restuans in the Midwestern United States.

Malaria journal·2026
Same author

Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Between Suction Aspiration and Combination Methods of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Cerebral Infarction: The COMPETE Trial.

Journal of Korean medical science·2026
Same author

Interfacial Siloxane Interactions to Enhance Semiconductor Ordering and Performance in Organic Thin-Film Transistors.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.4K

A Reproducible Benchmark for Gas Sensor Array Classification: From FE-ELM to ROCKET and TS2I-CNNs.

Chang-Hyun Kim1,2, Seung-Hwan Choi1, Sanghun Choi2

  • 1Department of Advanced Mobility Components Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Daegu 42994, Republic of Korea.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Classifying low-concentration Gas Sensor Array (GSA) data is challenging. The ROCKET time-series classifier achieved the highest accuracy on GSA datasets, outperforming other methods, including time-series-to-image (TS2I) CNNs.

Keywords:
Gas Sensor Array (GSA)Time-Series-to-Image (TS2I)time-series classification

More Related Videos

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe
09:34

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe

Published on: December 4, 2016

28.7K
Identification of Olfactory Volatiles using Gas Chromatography-Multi-unit Recordings GCMR in the Insect Antennal Lobe
09:49

Identification of Olfactory Volatiles using Gas Chromatography-Multi-unit Recordings GCMR in the Insect Antennal Lobe

Published on: February 24, 2013

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.4K
Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe
09:34

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe

Published on: December 4, 2016

28.7K
Identification of Olfactory Volatiles using Gas Chromatography-Multi-unit Recordings GCMR in the Insect Antennal Lobe
09:49

Identification of Olfactory Volatiles using Gas Chromatography-Multi-unit Recordings GCMR in the Insect Antennal Lobe

Published on: February 24, 2013

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Sensor Technology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Classifying low-concentration Gas Sensor Array (GSA) data presents significant challenges due to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), sensor heterogeneity, drift, and limited sample sizes.
  • Existing methods often struggle to achieve robust performance under these adverse conditions, necessitating novel approaches and comprehensive benchmarking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark various time-series classification methods, including time-series-to-image (TS2I) Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), against established baselines for low-concentration GSA data.
  • To provide a reproducible and fair comparison of different classification strategies to guide model selection in electronic nose (e-nose) applications.

Main Methods:

  • Reproduced a strong FE-ELM baseline and compared it with vector baselines, traditional time-series classifiers (TCN, MiniROCKET), and TS2I-CNNs.
  • Utilized the GSA-LC and GSA-FM datasets with a rigorous 20x5 repeated stratified cross-validation (n=100) for robust evaluation.
  • Assessed performance using accuracy and Macro-F1 scores, employing paired t-tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction for statistical significance.

Main Results:

  • The ROCKET time-series classifier achieved the highest accuracy on both GSA-FM (0.9721 ± 0.0480) and GSA-LC (0.9578 ± 0.0433) datasets, significantly outperforming TCN and MiniROCKET (p < 0.05).
  • Among image-based models, CNN-RP demonstrated the most robustness, while CNN-GASF showed limitations, particularly on the GSA-LC dataset.
  • RGB fusion strategies and transfer learning with ResNet-18 did not offer consistent advantages, indicating dataset-dependency and limited generalizability.

Conclusions:

  • ROCKET is the top-performing model for classifying low-concentration GSA data, offering superior accuracy and reliability.
  • CNN-RP serves as the most viable TS2I alternative for these challenging conditions, providing a robust image-based approach.
  • The study establishes a reproducible benchmark, offering practical guidance for model selection in e-nose systems and clarifying the capabilities of TS2I methods.