Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
A taxonomy of indicators for non-communicable diseases: agreement, definition, and contextual description using
Fabrizio Carinci1, Tamara Poljičanin2, Scott Cunningham3
1Unicamillus International Medical University, Rome, Italy.
Background:
The Collaborative Health Information European Framework (CHIEF) is an initiative led by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission to enable a sustainable data collection and production of indicators to monitor and evaluate best practices for people with NCDs.
Objectives:
We aimed to support international assessment and comparability of NCD indicators through a taxonomy of NCD indicators, a core set of measurable diabetes indicators and high-level policy recommendations.
Materials And Methods:
The study is an expert review run by the multidisciplinary expert group "CHIEF-diabetes.dwg" between 2022 and 2024. The group convened on several remote and in-presence meetings. A common set of key references were identified to underpin collective discussions and agree on the fundamental criteria for the selection of indicators. An iterative process was followed to reach agreement and release final recommendations.
Results:
A taxonomy of NCD indicators and relevant stakeholders was identified to guide the selection process. A core set of diabetes indicators was agreed, including: diabetes incidence and prevalence rate, retinopathy prevalence rate, major lower extremity amputation incidence rate, blindness rate and rate of end stage renal disease. Measurement issues across chronic diseases and data collection were included in recommendations to the EU.
Discussion:
The taxonomies and core set of diabetes indicators identified by the expert group may be used as a proof of concept of a collaborative European framework. The expert group recommended: (a) to determine the purpose of NCD indicators in advance; (b) to prioritise actionable indicators for the high-level governance of chronic diseases; (c) to align with existing standardisation processes; (d) to build on the experience of existing registries; and (e) to align with current efforts to strengthen the EU data infrastructure.
Conclusion:
The expert group delivered general guidance on criteria and principles for the selection of NCD indicators, using diabetes as a case study. The core set of six diabetes indicators can be used as a field-test for future reporting initiatives. In this context, disease registries can provide the high-quality data needed to compute reliable indicators. Targeted projects are needed to design a cohesive health information system of NCD indicators.
More Related Videos
08:13Study of In Vivo Glucose Metabolism in High-fat Diet-fed Mice Using Oral Glucose Tolerance Test OGTT and Insulin Tolerance Test ITT
Published on: January 7, 2018
07:22Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility,...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...