Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Treatment Model for Young Patients with Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction and Resultant Infertility
Published on: May 30, 2025
A Qualitative Exploration of Barriers to, and Interventions to Improve, Chlamydia Retesting in England Using the
Melissa Cabecinha1, Tom Witney2, John Saunders
1The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in Partnership with the UK Health Security Agency.
Background:
Chlamydia is the most diagnosed sexually transmitted infection among young people in England. Repeat infections are common, and the risk of complications from chlamydia increases with the number of lifetime infections. National guidelines recommend retesting 3 to 6 months after treatment; however, retesting rates remain low at 10% to 14%. The objectives of this study were to explore barriers to, and identify potential interventions to improve, chlamydia retesting among young people in England, using the behavior change wheel.
Methods:
Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 people aged 16 to 24 years who had previously been diagnosed with chlamydia. Participants were recruited from sexual health services in London, the South West, and the North West of England. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted, followed by thematic categorization to the behavior change wheel.
Results:
Barriers to retesting included low awareness and knowledge of the recommendation, and differences in how the term "retest" was interpreted. Participants' experience of the initial test influenced their willingness or intention to retest. Possible interventions to overcome barriers include routine discussions of retesting at diagnosis and the rationale behind the recommendation, retesting reminders from service providers, and opt-in self-sampling kits.
Conclusions:
Lack of awareness and varied interpretations of retest present challenges to retesting. Interventions such as routine discussions, text reminders, opt-in self-sampling kits, and clear guidance could improve awareness and understanding, and streamline the process. Future strategies should be developed with stakeholders and patients and assessed for acceptability, practicability, effectiveness, affordability, side-effects, and equity to maximize their real-world implementation and public health impact.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Cochran's Q Test
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Sexually Transmitted Infections