Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

15.4K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
15.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of Prokinetic Agents in Adult ICU Patients: An International Inception Cohort Study (PATIENCE).

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same author

Potential time-sensitive biomarkers for the detection of acute mesenteric ischaemia: a systematic review of animal data.

Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals·2026
Same author

Direct and mediated effects (DME) SLCMA: a novel method for life course modelling with time-varying covariates.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Time course of energy expenditure in persistent critical illness: a prospective multicentre study.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same author

The Glasgow Coma Scale as a predictor of mortality in intensive care: relevance of underlying cause of impaired consciousness.

Journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Notice of Retraction. Ren Y, et al. Personality Traits and Social Isolation in Older Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(5):e269569.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Error in Grant Number in Funding/Support Section.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

The Supplementary Role of Friends in Caregiving Networks.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Urbanicity, Neighborhood Conditions, and Dementia Mortality.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Equity and Cancer Survival Among Veterans Health Administration Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Limbic System Microstructure in Neonates With Antenatal Opioid Exposure.

JAMA network open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K

Rationale and Methodological Approach Underlying the Development of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2

Rui Moreno1,2,3, Andrew Rhodes4, Otavio Ranzani5,6,7

  • 1Hospital de São José, ULS de São José, Lisboa, Portugal.

JAMA Network Open
|October 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The revised Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA-2) score updates organ dysfunction definitions for critically ill adults. This new score reflects current practices and improves assessment of patient outcomes.

More Related Videos

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

20.7K
SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

16.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

20.7K
SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

16.6K

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Assessment

Background:

  • The original Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, published in 1996, requires revision due to significant advancements in organ support and patient outcomes over three decades.
  • Current clinical practices and understanding of organ dysfunction have evolved, necessitating an updated assessment tool.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop updated definitions of organ dysfunction reflecting current medical knowledge.
  • To identify key variables for a revised SOFA score (SOFA-2) to quantify individual organ dysfunction severity.

Main Methods:

  • A task force of 60 international experts in intensive care and epidemiology utilized Delphi processes and data synthesis, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • Variables were defined, graded from 0 to 4, and tested for predictive validity using large datasets (3.34 million patients) from diverse settings.
  • The original six organ systems were retained with updated terminology (e.g., brain, kidney, hemostasis, liver), and revisions were made to organ support variables.

Main Results:

  • The SOFA-2 score retains physiological variables from the original SOFA but incorporates updated definitions and terminology for organ systems.
  • Revisions to organ support variables reflect current clinical practice, with added alternative variables for low-resource settings or treatment limitations.
  • Validation exercises confirmed the distribution and predictive validity (mortality) of the SOFA-2 score across diverse patient populations.

Conclusions:

  • The SOFA-2 score provides updated, quantifiable criteria for assessing organ dysfunction in critically ill adult patients.
  • This revised score accounts for contemporary changes in patient management and outcomes, enhancing clinical utility.
  • The development process was methodologically robust, ensuring relevance and applicability in modern intensive care settings.