Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants
Published on: December 14, 2014
Minimizing placebo responses in clinical trials.
Christina Emborg1, Simple Futarmal Kothari1, Nanna Brix Finnerup2
1Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clinical trials for neurologic conditions face challenges due to high placebo responses. Minimizing placebo effects may not improve drug efficacy, suggesting a need to refine trial methods by incorporating patient perceptions.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Psychopharmacology
Background:
- Many clinical trials for neurologic conditions fail to show active treatments are superior to placebo.
- Increased placebo response rates are a potential factor contributing to these trial failures, impacting new therapy development.
- Current research often assumes minimizing placebo response is beneficial for improving the drug-placebo ratio.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore literature-based strategies for minimizing placebo responses in clinical trials.
- To evaluate the evidence supporting the minimization of placebo effects.
- To discuss whether reduced placebo responses enhance drug efficacy and trial success.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of suggested methods to minimize placebo responses in clinical trials.
- Evaluation of the evidence supporting these methods.
- Discussion on the relationship between placebo response reduction and drug response enhancement.
- Proposal for refining randomized controlled trial (RCT) methodologies.
Main Results:
- The chapter reviews various suggestions for minimizing placebo responses in clinical trials.
- The evidence supporting these minimization strategies is critically evaluated.
- The assumption that reducing placebo responses necessarily improves drug responses and trial outcomes is questioned.
Conclusions:
- Reducing placebo responses may not inherently enhance drug efficacy or guarantee successful clinical trials.
- Refining randomized controlled trial (RCT) methodologies by incorporating patient perceptions, emotions, and expectations is proposed.
- This approach could lead to more ecologically valid outcomes for neurologic treatments, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
Blind Procedures
The Placebo Effect
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

