Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

09:10
The Frequency Domain Thermoreflectance Technique for Thermal Property Measurements
Published on: December 5, 2025
475
Measurements of Small Field Output Correction Factors on a RefleXion Treatment Machine
Weili Zhong1, Zhe Jay Chen1, Min-Young Lee1
1Department of Therapeutic Radiology Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.
Precision Radiation Oncology
|October 30, 2025
Summary
This study determined small field output correction factors for detectors on the RefleXion system, finding most detectors met IAEA TRS-483 limits for accurate radiotherapy output measurements.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Dosimetry
Background:
- IAEA TRS-483 provides detector response data for small fields across various treatment machines.
- Data for the novel RefleXion system's small field dosimetry is limited.
- Accurate dosimetry in small fields is crucial for modern radiotherapy techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To measure output correction factors for multiple detectors in small fields specifically for a clinical RefleXion unit.
- To evaluate detector performance against established dosimetry protocols like IAEA TRS-483.
- To address the unexplored dosimetry data for the RefleXion system.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a clinical RefleXion unit with a binary multi-leaf collimator and Y-jaws.
- Established reference dosimetry using the 10 × 2 cm² clinical-reference field.
- Measured detector responses (Edge, Razor, Micro-Diamond, A14SL, CC01, CC03) in small rectangular fields (1.25 × 1 to 20 × 2 cm²) at 10 cm depth.
- Employed Gafchromic EBT4 film in a solid-water phantom as the reference for calculating correction factors.
Main Results:
- Most detectors (Edge, Razor, Micro-Diamond, A14SL, CC01, CC03) showed responses within ~0.5% of film reference in 2 cm jaw fields, except at 1.25 cm width.
- Edge and Micro-Diamond showed over-response at small field widths, while CC13 exhibited volume effects.
- In 1 cm jaw fields, Edge and Micro-Diamond were close to film, but CC13 (~4%) and A14SL (~2.5%) showed significant deviations.
Conclusions:
- Small field output correction factors were determined for six detectors on the RefleXion system, following IAEA TRS-483 formalism.
- All tested detectors, except CC13, met the recommended 5% correction limit for output factor measurements.
- This study provides essential data for accurate RefleXion system dosimetry in small fields.

