Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

07:30
Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples
Published on: June 8, 2020
12.6K
The effects of bioinformatics preprocessing on cell-free DNA fragment analysis
Ivna Ivanković1,2, Zsolt Balázs1,2, Todor Gitchev1,2
1Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.
Gigascience
|October 30, 2025
Summary
Bioinformatics preprocessing choices minimally impact cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis for cancer detection. However, specific analytical approaches, like fragment end motif analysis, can be optimized to improve cancer classification performance using cfDNA sequencing data.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
- Cancer Biomarkers
Background:
- Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) shows promise as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis and monitoring.
- Standardization of cfDNA collection, extraction, and bioinformatics analysis pipelines is lacking.
- This study focuses on the impact of bioinformatics preprocessing on cfDNA analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate how different bioinformatics preprocessing steps affect genetic and epigenetic cfDNA features.
- To determine how these feature variations influence the ability to distinguish between healthy and cancer cfDNA samples.
- To identify optimal preprocessing strategies for enhanced cancer detection using cfDNA.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of low-pass whole-genome cfDNA sequencing data from 20 lung cancer and 20 healthy samples.
- Assessment of preprocessing variations: read trimming, alignment filtering, genome build selection, downsampling, and fragment size selection.
- Evaluation of cfDNA features: fragment size, end motifs, copy number alterations, and nucleosome footprints.
Main Results:
- Most cfDNA features are robust to common preprocessing choices but sensitive to sequencing coverage.
- Fragment length and end motifs are least affected by low coverage; nucleosome footprints are highly sensitive.
- In silico selection of shorter fragments enhances cancer signals but reduces overall data, with fragment end motif analysis showing the most benefit.
- Filtering alignments and genome build selection slightly improve cancer classification based on nucleosome coverage and copy number alterations.
Conclusions:
- Bioinformatics preprocessing settings have a minimal impact on cfDNA analysis.
- Synergistic effects between analytical approaches can be leveraged for improved cancer detection.
- Optimizing preprocessing and analytical strategies can enhance the utility of cfDNA as a cancer biomarker.

