Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

04:41
Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
845
Complications With Intramedullary Nailing of Fibula Fractures With Open Reduction: A Prospective Study
Stephanie E Dal Porto-Kujanpaa1, Ramez Sakkab1, Samantha R Spierling Bagsic2
1*Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
|October 30, 2025
Summary
Fibular nailing for ankle fractures shows limited benefit with open reduction due to a high complication rate. Further research is needed to compare percutaneous versus open reduction techniques for fibular nail fixation.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Traumatology
Background:
- Ankle fractures are common intra-articular fractures.
- Open reduction and internal fixation via a lateral approach is standard for unstable fractures.
- Intramedullary fibular nail fixation is increasingly used for distal fibula fractures to minimize soft-tissue damage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes and complication rates of ankle fracture patients treated with fibular nail fixation.
- To assess the efficacy of fibular nailing when combined with open reduction.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study included 61 consecutive patients with ankle fractures treated using a fibular nail.
- Open reduction of the fibula fracture was performed in 54 patients (88.5%) via a 3-5 cm incision.
- Follow-up was conducted for a median of 15.9 months.
Main Results:
- The overall complication rate was 24.6%, with fibular fixation/lateral approach complications at 16.4%.
- Minor infection and hardware removal were the most frequent complications (8.2% each).
- Deep infections occurred in 3.3% of patients, and malreduction in 1.6%.
Conclusions:
- The current data suggest that the benefits of fibular nailing are limited when open reduction is employed.
- Further investigation is warranted to compare fibular nail fixation outcomes with percutaneous versus open reduction techniques.

