Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
Published on: June 12, 2016
Global methane action pays for itself at least six times over
Thomas Stoerk1,2, James Rising3, Drew Shindell4
1Economics and Research Department, National Bank of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.
None:
We provide a comprehensive assessment of the economic benefits and costs of global methane emissions abatement, anchored on the Global Methane Pledge. We use an integrated assessment model to estimate avoided climate damages at the global and country levels, including quantification of tipping points and risk. We further estimate air-quality cobenefits and methane abatement costs. We find that global methane action would be highly beneficial, yielding a benefit-cost ratio of at least six. It would provide larger benefits in lower-income countries, and it would reduce tipping point intensity and risk. We provide estimates of the social cost of methane to compare with previous literature and show that these estimates imply that key economies, such as the United States, European Union, and China, should be self-interested to abate methane emissions substantially.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms
Bioremediation
Overview of Archaea

