International Expert Consensus Recommendations for HER2 Reporting in Breast Cancer: Focus on HER2-Low and Ultralow
Emad A Rakha1, Puay Hoon Tan2, Mieke R Van Bockstal3
1Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Department of Pathology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Abstract:
The concept of "HER2-negative" breast cancer is evolving, with the recognition of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow subsets. These subsets are clinically relevant regarding treatment with the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), which has shown survival benefit in patients with metastatic carcinoma with minimal HER2 protein expression that lack HER2 gene amplification by in situ hybridization. In clinical trials using T-DXd, HER2-low was defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 1+ or an IHC score 2+ without HER2 gene amplification. HER2-ultralow was defined as faint or barely perceptible, incomplete membrane staining in >0% to ≤10% of tumor cells (IHC score 0+/with membrane staining) and HER2-null as the complete absence of staining (IHC score 0/absent membrane staining). These results now necessitate more detailed evaluation and reporting of traditional "HER2-negative" results to identify patients with metastatic breast cancer who may benefit from T-DXd therapy. Both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have extended the regulatory approval of T-DXd to patients with metastatic breast cancer showing HER2-low or HER2-ultralow expressions. Updated clinical management guidelines now, therefore, incorporate the spectrum of HER2 results into treatment selection algorithms in the metastatic setting. To align histopathologic practice with these developments, the College of American Pathologists has issued a new biomarker-reporting template that recommends explicit distinction between IHC 0/absent membrane staining and IHC 0+/with membrane staining. Key concerns among pathologists include assay variability, scoring reproducibility, and quality assurance standards for accurately detecting such low levels of HER2 expression. This manuscript provides expert consensus, evidence-based practical recommendations for identifying and reporting tumors with HER2-low and HER2-ultralow expression. We emphasize standardized testing protocols, validated assays, robust internal and external controls, and focused training for pathologists. A universal structured pathology report is proposed to highlight the accurate distinction between IHC 0 (null), IHC 0+ (ultralow), and HER2-low expressions.
More Related Videos
11:34Building Up a High-throughput Screening Platform to Assess the Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancers
Published on: December 5, 2017
08:28Validated Immunochemical Assay for Comprehensive Determination of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Released from and Bound to Cells
Published on: May 9, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Treatment Resistent Cancers
