Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Engineering Molecular Tools for Disease Detection and Imaging
Published on: December 8, 2023
Renal cell carcinoma detection: a systematic review in diagnostic urinary biomarkers
Jaycey F Kelly1, Iryna V Samarska1, Bram Ramaekers2
1Department of Pathology, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202AZ, The Netherlands.
Background:
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 90% of all renal neoplasms and is often incidentally detected through unrelated imaging procedures. Differentiating between benign and malignant renal masses remains challenging using imaging alone. Urinary biomarkers may aid in this distinction, yet none are currently implemented in the clinic. Moreover, a comprehensive overview of urinary diagnostic biomarkers for RCC is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review and summarize existing literature on potential urinary biomarkers with diagnostic properties for RCC.
Methods:
PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were used for the identification of eligible studies evaluating urinary biomarkers in adults with sporadic RCC which reported diagnostic properties compared to controls groups. Standardized data extraction was performed. Risk of bias of was assessed by using a modified STROBE 22-items checklist for observational studies.
Results:
In total 136 articles were identified through database search, four via a previous review and 19 through cross-referencing. After screening, 46 articles were included, identifying 105 individual biomarkers: metabolites (n = 40), proteins (n = 29), miRNAs (n = 12), DNA methylation markers (n = 13) and others (n = 11). Additionally, 29 multi-biomarker panels were described. Promising diagnostic markers (AUC ≥ 0.80) included dysregulated energy metabolism markers, proteins AQP1 and PLIN2, and miRNAs; miR-122-5p, miR-15a and miR-30c, however validation is severely lacking.
Conclusions:
Various urinary biomarkers for RCC show promising diagnostic potential. The diagnostic ability of multi-biomarker panels often exceeded those of individual markers. However, individual markers and panels require external validation before clinical implementation.
Trial Registration:
This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023474582), and was designed and written based on the PRISMA guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

