Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
Published on: December 23, 2022
Evaluation of radiologists' accuracy and interrater reliability when interpreting CT scans after ventral hernia
Fahim Kanani1,2, Rina Neeman3, Narmin Zoabi4
1Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. kanani.fahim@gmail.com.
Background:
Accurate interpretation of computed tomography (CT) prior to ventral hernia repair (VHR) is critical for operative planning, particularly in recurrent cases where prior mesh type and placement influence surgical approach. While radiologists possess specialized expertise in imaging interpretation, their performance in identifying post-VHR mesh characteristics remains unstudied. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of radiologists in identifying mesh plane and type on CT following VHR.
Methods:
Forty body radiologists from 16 centers evaluated 18 de-identified CT scans, including 12 post-VHR cases and 6 controls. After receiving standardized training on mesh characteristics and surgical planes, radiologists were tasked with identifying both the VHR mesh plane and the mesh type. The study assessed correct identification rates, interrater reliability, and repeatability.
Results:
Radiologists demonstrated overall accuracy rates of 39.2% for mesh plane identification and 43.5% for mesh type identification. Accuracy was highest for intraperitoneal approaches (53.8%) and heavy-weight mesh (52.5%), with significantly lower accuracy (16.9-22.5%) for other surgical planes and mesh types (30.6%). Interrater reliability was poor (Gwet's AC1 = 0.127), with significant between-radiologist variability. Self-reported confidence levels correlated positively with accuracy rates, with high-confidence radiologists showing significantly better performance (OR 4.55, p < 0.001). Years of clinical experience did not predict diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusions:
Radiologists demonstrated limited ability to accurately interpret post-VHR CT scans, even after targeted instruction. These diagnostic challenges mirror findings among abdominal wall reconstruction surgeons, suggesting inherent limitations in CT-based assessment rather than discipline-specific deficits. Multidisciplinary collaboration, standardized operative documentation, and dedicated abdominal wall imaging protocol and training are essential to improve diagnostic accuracy and optimize surgical planning.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography

