AdaGen: Learning Adaptive Policy for Image Synthesis

Recent advances in image synthesis have been propelled by powerful generative models, such as Masked Generative Transformers (MaskGIT), autoregressive models, diffusion models, and rectified flow models. A common principle behind their success is the decomposition of complex synthesis tasks into multiple tractable steps. However, this introduces a proliferation of step-specific parameters to be configured for modulating the iterative generation process (e.g., mask ratio, noise level, or temperature at each step). Existing approaches typically rely on manually-designed scheduling rules to manage this complexity, demanding expert knowledge and extensive trial-and-error. Furthermore, these static schedules lack the flexibility to adapt to the unique characteristics of each individual sample, yielding sub-optimal performance. To address this issue, we present AdaGen, a general, learnable, and sample-adaptive framework for scheduling the iterative generation process. Specifically, we formulate the scheduling problem as a Markov Decision Process, where a lightweight policy network is introduced to adaptively determine the most suitable parameters given the current generation state, and can be trained through reinforcement learning. Importantly, we demonstrate that simple reward designs, such as FID or pre-trained reward models, can be easily hacked and may not reliably guarantee the desired quality or diversity of generated samples. Therefore, we propose an adversarial reward design to guide the training of the policy networks effectively. Finally, we introduce an inference-time refinement strategy and a controllable fidelity-diversity trade-off mechanism to further enhance the performance and flexibility of AdaGen. Comprehensive experiments across five benchmark datasets (ImageNet-256 × 256 & 512 × 512, MS-COCO, CC3M, and LAION-5B) and four distinct generative paradigms validate the superiority of AdaGen . For example, AdaGen achieves better performance on DiT-XL with $\mathbf {\sim 3\times }$∼3× lower inference cost and improves the FID of VAR from 1.92 to 1.59 with negligible additional computational overhead.