Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Why more social interactions lead to more polarization in societies
Stefan Thurner1,2,3, Markus Hofer1,2, Jan Korbel1,2
1Center for Medical Data Science, Institute of the Science of Complex Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.
None:
Over the past two decades, the number of close social connections increased substantially, at least by a factor of two. At the same time, societal opinions have become increasingly polarized in many Western countries. To explore whether these trends could be connected, we employ a simple computational model of society, where people-within their social networks-continuously compare and update their opinions. Here, we show that the model that is known to realistically capture both homophily and social balance exhibits a phase transition phenomenon where, above a critical social connectivity, an explosive transition toward strong polarization must occur. The model allows us to understand the empirical inflation of polarization during the last decades as a function of the observed increased values of social connectivity. In the presence of a small fraction of synchronized influencers, the transition becomes continuous; however, polarization then appears at lower connectivities. We discuss the implications of the presence of a phase transition in social polarization.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
Impact of Groups on Groups
In- and Out-Groups
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior
Impact of Individuals on Individuals

