Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

220.2K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
220.2K
Altruism01:03

Altruism

29.9K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
29.9K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

57.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
57.2K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.7K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

52.0K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
52.0K
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

4.4K
Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The crucible of resilience: hormesis as the unifying principle of evolution, genetics, and epigenetics.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same author

Hormesis in biomedical and toxicological models: A generalizable phenomenon induced by per- and polyfluoroalkyl agents.

Chemico-biological interactions·2026
Same author

Canine environmental health: An EPA blind spot? Canine physiology, environmental exposure, and the regulatory gap in U.S. policy.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same author

Hormetic effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on ecologically relevant animal models: Generality, quantitative features, and risk assessment implications.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2026
Same author

How the US NAS BEAR I Genetics Panel scientific misconduct could have been avoided, but was not.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2026
Same author

BEAR I Genetics Panel: An unexpected and troubling historical twist: The untold story of Hermann Muller's significant scientific confusion.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Construction of Cell-based Neurotransmitter Fluorescent Engineered Reporters CNiFERs for Optical Detection of Neurotransmitters In Vivo
12:48

Construction of Cell-based Neurotransmitter Fluorescent Engineered Reporters CNiFERs for Optical Detection of Neurotransmitters In Vivo

Published on: May 12, 2016

13.7K

Hermann J. Muller: Another ethical improbity: Deceiving the journal Science.

Edward J Calabrese1

  • 1Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
|October 31, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Hermann J. Muller’s letter reveals his deceptive tactics in promoting his eugenics book, highlighting ethical concerns and a lack of transparency in scientific communication. This case study underscores the importance of honesty in research and scientific discourse.

Keywords:
Eugenicshistory of sciencemutationpeer reviewprecautionary principleresearch ethics

More Related Videos

Exploring Adipose Tissue Structure by Methylsalicylate Clearing and 3D Imaging
10:10

Exploring Adipose Tissue Structure by Methylsalicylate Clearing and 3D Imaging

Published on: August 19, 2020

8.1K
Author Spotlight: Advanced Integrated Model for Sepsis-Induced Myopathy and Single-Cell Metabolic Analysis
04:01

Author Spotlight: Advanced Integrated Model for Sepsis-Induced Myopathy and Single-Cell Metabolic Analysis

Published on: June 14, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Construction of Cell-based Neurotransmitter Fluorescent Engineered Reporters CNiFERs for Optical Detection of Neurotransmitters In Vivo
12:48

Construction of Cell-based Neurotransmitter Fluorescent Engineered Reporters CNiFERs for Optical Detection of Neurotransmitters In Vivo

Published on: May 12, 2016

13.7K
Exploring Adipose Tissue Structure by Methylsalicylate Clearing and 3D Imaging
10:10

Exploring Adipose Tissue Structure by Methylsalicylate Clearing and 3D Imaging

Published on: August 19, 2020

8.1K
Author Spotlight: Advanced Integrated Model for Sepsis-Induced Myopathy and Single-Cell Metabolic Analysis
04:01

Author Spotlight: Advanced Integrated Model for Sepsis-Induced Myopathy and Single-Cell Metabolic Analysis

Published on: June 14, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • History of Science
  • Scientific Ethics
  • Genetics and Eugenics

Background:

  • Hermann J. Muller, a Nobel laureate, authored "Out of the Night: A Biologist's View of the Future," a book on eugenics.
  • Muller communicated with James McKeen Cattell, editor of the journal *Science*, to solicit a review of his book.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze Hermann J. Muller's letter to the editor of *Science* regarding the review of his eugenics book.
  • To examine Muller's lack of transparency and deceptive practices in suggesting reviewers.
  • To explore the ethical implications of Muller's actions on scientific integrity and the culture of science.

Main Methods:

  • Historical analysis of a letter from Hermann J. Muller to James McKeen Cattell.
  • Examination of Muller's proposed reviewers and their known affiliations with eugenics.
  • Contextualization of Muller's actions within his broader career and advocacy.

Main Results:

  • Muller's letter demonstrates a deliberate lack of transparency regarding his relationships with suggested reviewers.
  • Muller failed to disclose the reviewers' strong advocacy for eugenics-based policies.
  • The analysis reveals Muller's pattern of self-promotion and ideological advocacy.

Conclusions:

  • Muller's actions exemplify ethical impropriety and bias within the scientific community.
  • The case challenges the culture of science, emphasizing the need for honesty and transparency.
  • While a talented scientist, Muller's personal failings impacted the integrity of scientific research.