Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound

Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound

To obtain accurate blood pressure measurements in clinical settings, especially when traditional methods are insufficient, healthcare professionals utilize the Doppler ultrasound technique. This method uses high-frequency sound waves to detect blood flow within the arteries, which is crucial for patients with conditions that complicate circulatory system assessment.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers

Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers

Cardiac biomarkers are enzymes, proteins, and hormones released into the blood when cardiac cells are injured. They are powerful tools for triaging.
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Underdamping: An elephant in the room?

Intensive care medicine·2026

Same author

The Weaning Index during Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Predicting Extubation Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Bicentric Prospective Study.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same author

Access to haemodynamic evaluation tools in middle-income countries: a survey of 1593 anaesthetists and intensivists from 39 nations.

BJA open·2026

Same author

Implementation of an emergency abdominal surgery classification: A propensity score-weighted before-after study.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2025

Same author

Not all pulse contour algorithms are created equal.

Critical care (London, England)·2025

Same author

Perioperative cardiac output monitoring for the many.

Intensive care medicine·2025

Same journal

Guidelines: Diagnosis and management of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions 2025.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

The vital role of distal end location of endotracheal tubes in human trachea.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

Associations of Pain, Analgesia Technique, and Psychological Factors with Central Sensitization after Childbirth.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

Perioperative management of liver resection surgery.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

CartoPhaRe: a nation-wide survey of clinical pharmacy activities in French Critical Care Units.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

Patients' and physicians' biased behaviours during pre-anaesthesia consultation: The BiPAC prospective survey study.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Multiple Intravenous Bolus Dosing and Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment in a Hypoxia-Induced Mouse Pulmonary Artery Hypertension Model

Multiple Intravenous Bolus Dosing and Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment in a Hypoxia-Induced Mouse Pulmonary Artery Hypertension Model

Published on: November 11, 2022

Hemodynamic phenotyping 4.0.

Frederic Michard¹, Osama Abou Arab²

¹MiCo, Vallamand, Switzerland.

Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine

|October 31, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Visual tools offer a practical alternative to machine learning (ML) for identifying hemodynamic phenotypes at the bedside. These tools leverage graphical information for rapid assessment, potentially improving patient safety and cost-effectiveness compared to complex ML algorithms.

Keywords:

Graphical display Hemodynamic monitoring Hemodynamic phenotype Hemodynamic profile Machine learning Visual decision support

More Related Videos

Brain Pericyte Calcium and Hemodynamic Imaging in Transgenic Mice In Vivo

Brain Pericyte Calcium and Hemodynamic Imaging in Transgenic Mice In Vivo

Published on: November 20, 2021

Induction and Phenotyping of Acute Right Heart Failure in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Induction and Phenotyping of Acute Right Heart Failure in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Published on: March 17, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Multiple Intravenous Bolus Dosing and Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment in a Hypoxia-Induced Mouse Pulmonary Artery Hypertension Model

Multiple Intravenous Bolus Dosing and Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment in a Hypoxia-Induced Mouse Pulmonary Artery Hypertension Model

Published on: November 11, 2022

Brain Pericyte Calcium and Hemodynamic Imaging in Transgenic Mice In Vivo

Brain Pericyte Calcium and Hemodynamic Imaging in Transgenic Mice In Vivo

Published on: November 20, 2021

Induction and Phenotyping of Acute Right Heart Failure in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Induction and Phenotyping of Acute Right Heart Failure in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Published on: March 17, 2022

Area of Science:

Cardiology
Medical Technology
Physiology

Background:

Hemodynamic phenotypes are crucial for understanding cardiovascular physiology, shock, and treatment.
Traditional methods rely on integrating hemodynamic variables to define patient profiles.
Recent innovations include machine learning (ML) and visual decision support tools for bedside assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the utility of machine learning (ML) algorithms versus visual tools for identifying hemodynamic phenotypes at the bedside.
To question the necessity of complex ML algorithms for integrating and interpreting limited hemodynamic data.
To highlight the potential of visual tools as a practical alternative to ML-based solutions.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of machine learning (ML) algorithms and visual decision support tools for hemodynamic phenotyping.
Assessment of data integration and interpretation capabilities for "small data" sets.
Evaluation of the accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and clinical applicability of both approaches.

Main Results:

Machine learning (ML) algorithms may not be essential for "small data" hemodynamic analysis.
ML-identified phenotypes can mirror traditional profiles but may present inconsistencies impacting patient safety.
Visual tools effectively leverage clinicians' graphical processing abilities for rapid hemodynamic profile recognition.

Conclusions:

Visual tools present a practical, accessible, and cost-effective alternative to complex ML algorithms for bedside hemodynamic phenotyping.
Further research is needed to compare the clinical impact of visual versus ML-driven phenotyping.
Visual tools enhance understanding of cardiovascular physiology and enable quick recognition of hemodynamic profiles.