Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

06:52
Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
10.4K
Two Easy-to-Use Scores to Identify Acute Geriatric Patients With High Rehabilitation Success
Julian Gutheil1, Bettina Göbel2, Peter Fasching3
1HEALTH-Institute for Biomedical Research and Technologies, JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Graz, Austria.
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
|October 31, 2025
Summary
New scores, Discharged Home Score (DHS) and Barthel Index Improvement Score (BIS), can help identify geriatric patients who will benefit from acute geriatric ward (AGW) stays. These tools predict rehabilitation success, aiding timely and effective patient care.
Area of Science:
- Geriatric Medicine
- Rehabilitation Science
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Geriatric patients often benefit from acute geriatric ward (AGW) stays.
- Lack of objective measures hinders identification of suitable candidates for AGW.
- Predictive tools are needed to assess rehabilitation success in geriatric patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop and evaluate two standardized predictive scores: Discharged Home Score (DHS) and Barthel Index Improvement Score (BIS).
- Identify geriatric patients who would benefit from an AGW stay by predicting rehabilitation success.
- Facilitate timely and effective therapeutic interventions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study involving 78,654 patient stays across 24 Austrian AGWs.
- Development of DHS (predicting post-AGW care situation) and BIS (predicting Barthel Index improvement) using regression models.
- Feature selection based on clinical discussion and statistical methods; evaluation on distinct datasets.
Main Results:
- DHS demonstrated strong predictive performance (AUC 0.775–0.827).
- BIS showed moderate predictive capability (AUC 0.692–0.711), explaining 17.7–22.1% of variance in Barthel Index improvement.
- Performance varied across different AGWs.
Conclusions:
- DHS and BIS offer a nuanced assessment of rehabilitation success in AGW patients.
- DHS is simpler to apply; BIS provides a more precise rehabilitation outcome prediction.
- Scores require further validation for clinical practice but show potential for improving patient identification and care.

