Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Research on gear shaving error analysis based on knowledge graph
1School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, 710055, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
The influencing factors of shaving-induced mid-profile concavity error and tooth profile errors are numerous and complex, yet they lack effective interconnections, resulting in severe siloization issues. Existing literature research and practical manufacturing data have primarily accumulated the relationship between the influence of individual factors on gear shaving error and stored in the form of text dispersed. These discrete knowledges can't be systematically integrated and utilized and individual factor influence mechanism can't be effectively shared, resulting in the failure to quantitatively differentiate between the factors of the role of the mechanism, while the unclear underlying mechanisms obstruct the fundamental revelation of the mapping relationship between shaving-induced mid-profile concavity error and tooth profile errors. To address this, this study derives computational formulas for the improved gear shaving tooth profile cutting depth error and shaving allowance, solving the gear shaving tooth profile cutting depth error and shaving allowance by the shaving cutting parameter (radial feed), and analyzing the influence law of radial feed on the gear shaving tooth profile cutting depth error and shaving allowance. Experimental results demonstrate that when the degree of overlap ranges from 1.3 to 1.9, and the axis intersection angle error falls within 0.2°~0.5°, selecting a radial feed of 44 ~ 50 μm simultaneously reduces tooth profile middle-concave error and tooth profile errors in workpiece gears. To resolve the lack of factor correlation, the Neo4j graph database was employed to construct a knowledge graph of influencing factors for shaving-induced mid-profile concavity error and tooth profile errors. This framework enables unified management of shaving error factors, the expression of correlations between knowledge entities, and relevant search and reasoning. It effectively resolves the issue of missing intrinsic connections among shaving error factors, realizes efficient retrieval and reasoning of knowledge regarding the intrinsic mechanism through which shaving error factors induce gear shaving errors, and thereby better facilitates the solution to tooth profile errors in shaving processes.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Transmission Shafts: Problem Solving
Next, use bending moment diagrams for the shaft to...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Random Error
Graphical Representation of Inequalities
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

