Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Fluorescence Assays for the Study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Interaction with the Immune Receptor SLAMF1
Published on: February 28, 2025
Alveolar macrophage transcriptional signatures associated with resistance to TST/IGRA conversion following
Austin M Haynes1,2, Cristian Ovadiuc3, Glenna J Peterson4
1Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. austinhaynes137@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Despite heavy exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), some individuals are resistant to TST and IGRA conversion (RSTRs). The functional and immunological mechanisms governing resistance are poorly understood. We hypothesized that RSTR and LTBI alveolar macrophages (AMs) respond differently to Mtb infection with transcriptional programs that are distinct from peripheral blood monocytes. We examined media and Mtb-infected AMs from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid collected from a RSTR cohort in Uganda with over 10 years of clinical follow-up. With transcriptional profiles of BAL cells analyzed immediately after collection, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed 13 differentially expressed gene sets between RSTR (n = 19) and LTBI (n = 26) groups, including one (Hallmark E2F targets) which was positively enriched in the RSTR group (FDR < 0.3). In a subset of this cohort (n = 7 RSTR and 8 LTBI), AMs were examined with and without Mtb infection. When comparing the RSTR and LTBI groups, we identified 52 DEGs including 22 in the media condition, 15 with Mtb stimulation, and 11 with the interaction term (FDR < 0.2, Log 2-fold change > 1/<-1). Notably, RSTR AMs appear to upregulate inflammation more strongly than LTBI counterparts, including Hallmark inflammatory response (FDR < 0.2), IFNγ response (FDR < 0.1), and IFNα response (FDR < 0.1) while existing in a more non-inflammatory state at baseline (Hallmark TNF signaling via NF-kB (down, FDR < 0.1), inflammatory response (down, FDR < 0.1). In a comparison of peripheral blood monocyte gene expression profiles from the same cohort, there were both shared and AM-specific RSTR profiles detected. Together, these results suggest that RSTR and LTBI AMs have different basal and Mtb-induced transcriptional profiles, including some that differ from peripheral blood monocytes.
More Related Videos
10:10A 3D Human Lung Tissue Model for Functional Studies on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection
Published on: October 5, 2015
10:43Polarization of M1 and M2 Human Monocyte-Derived Cells and Analysis with Flow Cytometry upon Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection
Published on: September 18, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...