Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Endotracheal Intubation via Tracheotomy and Subsequent Thoracotomy in Rats for Non-Survival Applications
Published on: March 15, 2024
Evaluation of aspiration versus microsurgical resection for primary superficial pyogenic brain abscesses: results
Thomas Eibl1, Leonard Ritter1, Matthias Matejka2
11Department of Neurosurgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg General Hospital, Nuremberg, Germany.
Objective:
Brain abscesses are severe infections with high morbidity and mortality. Surgical drainage is essential, but the optimal technique remains unclear. The aim of this multicenter study was to compare navigated/stereotactic aspiration and microsurgical resection in terms of reoperation rates, clinical outcomes, and surgery-related complications in patients with primary pyogenic brain abscess.
Methods:
A multicentric retrospective analysis was conducted across 5 university centers in Germany and Austria, and included patients who underwent surgery for primary pyogenic brain abscesses from January 2008 to December 2023. Exclusion criteria were previous head surgery or trauma, lack of preoperative MRI, multiple abscesses, concomitant subdural empyema, and infratentorial or deep-seated abscesses (> 2 cm from the cortical surface). The primary endpoint was reoperation for the abscess, while secondary endpoints included unfavorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score ≥ 3) at discharge, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery and surgery-related complications.
Results:
Of 148 patients (102 male, mean age 49.1 years) included in the analysis, 82 (55.4%) underwent microsurgical resection and 66 (44.6%) underwent aspiration. Reoperations were significantly more frequent in the aspiration group (39.4%) than in the resection group (20.7%) (p = 0.018). Surgical complication rates did not differ significantly. A significant improvement in clinical status (median mRS score of 1) was observed in both the aspiration and resection groups (p < 0.001 each) after surgery, with 26 patients (17.6%) still having an mRS score ≥ 3 at discharge. In the aspiration group, no further improvement was noted between hospital discharge and the 3-month follow-up (p = 0.34), but significant improvement occurred between the 3- and 6-month follow-up evaluations (p = 0.02). In contrast, patients in the resection group showed significant improvement between discharge and the 3-month follow-up (p < 0.001), with no additional improvement observed between 3 and 6 months (p = 0.49). Five in-hospital deaths occurred, all in the aspiration group, resulting in an overall mortality of 3.4% (p = 0.005).
Conclusions:
Aspiration was linked to an increased reoperation rate and higher in-hospital mortality, although surgical complication rates were similar. Patients in both groups had comparable favorable outcomes at discharge and at 3- and 6-month follow-up evaluations. Patients who underwent open resection showed faster early recovery.
Insights
Microsurgical resection for brain abscesses led to fewer reoperations and faster recovery compared to aspiration. While both methods improved patient outcomes, resection showed a quicker initial recovery and lower in-hospital mortality.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Infectious Diseases
- Surgical Techniques
Background:
- Brain abscesses present significant morbidity and mortality.
- Surgical intervention is crucial for managing brain abscesses.
- Optimal surgical techniques for primary pyogenic brain abscesses require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare navigated/stereotactic aspiration versus microsurgical resection for primary pyogenic brain abscesses.
- To evaluate reoperation rates, clinical outcomes, and surgical complications.
- To determine the most effective surgical approach for brain abscess treatment.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter retrospective analysis of 148 patients across 5 university centers.
- Inclusion of patients with primary pyogenic brain abscesses (2008-2023).
- Exclusion of patients with specific complicating factors (e.g., prior surgery, multiple abscesses).
- Primary endpoint: reoperation rate. Secondary endpoints: clinical outcomes (mRS), complications.
Main Results:
- Reoperations were significantly higher in the aspiration group (39.4%) versus resection (20.7%).
- Surgical complication rates were similar between groups.
- Both groups showed clinical improvement (mRS), but resection patients had faster early recovery.
- In-hospital mortality was higher in the aspiration group (3.4%) compared to resection.
Conclusions:
- Aspiration is associated with increased reoperation rates and higher in-hospital mortality.
- Microsurgical resection offers faster early recovery for brain abscess patients.
- Both techniques yield comparable long-term favorable outcomes, but resection demonstrates advantages in early recovery and mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Brain Abscess l: Introduction

