Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatic Fibrosis Diagnosis Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography and AI
Published on: July 21, 2023
Two-tier screening approach for liver fibrosis stratification in outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A
Alessandro Mantovani1,2, Rosa Lombardi3,4, Andrea Dalbeni5
1Metabolic Diseases Research Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.
Background:
To examine the prevalence and severity of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to assess the effectiveness of the EASL-EASD-EASO algorithm for liver fibrosis screening.
Methods:
We retrospectively enrolled 1203 Italian older outpatients with T2DM who underwent vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) assessment. MASLD was defined as CAP ≥248 dB/m. Significant liver fibrosis was defined as LSM ≥8 kPa, compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) as LSM ≥10 kPa, and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) as LSM ≥25 kPa or LSM ≥20 kPa and platelet count <150 000/mm3. FIB-4 index was calculated in all participants.
Results:
The prevalence rates of MASLD, significant liver fibrosis, cACLD, and CSPH were 71.3%, 21.1%, 11.7% and 1.7%, respectively. A 2-tier screening strategy for liver fibrosis using the FIB-4 index and VCTE showed that among patients with a normal FIB-4 index, 629 (83.3%) had LSM <8 kPa and 126 (16.7%) had LSM≥8 kPa. Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of the FIB-4 index for detecting LSM≥8 kPa were 50.4%, 66.3%, 83.3% and 28.6%, respectively. Increased body weight (adjusted-OR 3.34, 95%CI 1.75-6.39) and elevated ALT levels (adjusted-OR 1.54, 95%CI 1.01-2.36) were the strongest predictors of significant liver fibrosis.
Conclusions:
MASLD and significant liver fibrosis are common in older patients with T2DM. Fibrosis risk stratification using FIB-4, followed by VCTE, is a good strategy in real-world settings. However, relying solely on FIB-4 may fail to identify some patients with advanced disease, particularly those with increased body weight and elevated serum aminotransferase levels.
More Related Videos
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
04:14Incorporation of a Survivable Liver Biopsy Procedure in Mice to Assess Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis NASH Resolution
Published on: April 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications