Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Interprovider Variation in Initiation of Bone-Modifying Agents for Patients With Prostate Cancer
Aaron P Mitchell1,2,3, Andrew Salner4, Paul Palyca5
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Purpose:
Oncology clinical practice guidelines recommend bone-modifying agents (BMAs) to decrease skeletal-related events for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and against BMAs to decrease skeletal-related events in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Previous studies have identified gaps in guideline-concordant BMA use, but interprovider variation is poorly understood.
Methods:
We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and bone metastases during 2020-2021. The sample included three health systems in the Northeastern United States: two community-based networks and one academic cancer center. Patient characteristics and BMA use (zoledronic acid and denosumab) were ascertained via chart review. The outcomes of interest were BMA overuse during castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC; defined as BMA initiation before emergence of castration-resistant prostate cancer [CRPC], among patients without a comorbid condition for which BMA therapy may be appropriate: osteoporosis, osteopenia, or osteoporotic fracture) and appropriate use during CRPC (BMA initiation after emergence of CRPC).
Results:
There were 153 eligible patients, 51 from each health system. At diagnosis, 14 (9%) patients had documented osteoporosis or osteopenia, 22 (14%) had previous osteoporotic fracture, and 36 (24%) had chronic renal insufficiency. Among 95 patients assessable for overuse during CSPC, 16% (n = 17) received BMA (ranging from 13% to 21% among the three systems). Among 55 patients who developed CRPC, 44% (n = 24) had initiated BMA therapy as of most recent follow-up. There was greater variation in use during CRPC, ranging from 22% to 54% across the three systems.
Conclusion:
BMA overuse in mCSPC was rare, potentially reflecting de-implementation following evidence of lack of benefit. Appropriate BMA use for patients with mCRPC varies substantially among clinicians and health care systems. Interventions to increase guideline-concordant care may improve outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Patient-Related Factors
Age stands as a key determinant in protein-drug binding. Neonates, characterized by low albumin content, experience heightened concentrations of unbound drugs such as phenytoin and...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

