Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Implementation modifications and outcomes of a pharmacist-led primary care remote hypertension service
Background:
National guidelines recommend team-based remote blood pressure (BP) management as standard care, but implementation in actual clinical settings is complex and requires more insights from real-world practices.
Objectives:
We offer practical insights and share lessons learned regarding challenges and potential solutions for advancing pharmacist-led remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) for hypertension. We aim to: (1) detail key contextual factors that informed and shaped the intervention; (2) describe intervention components, noting when and why specific modifications were introduced; and (3) analyze how implementation decisions impacted outcomes over time.
Practice Description:
Guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework, we describe the key practice contextual factors that contributed to implementation of RPM for hypertension.
Practice Innovation:
Applying the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Interventions, we identify when and why modifications were made. We detail intervention components and various strategies used for dissemination, implementation processes, innovation integration, capacity-building, and scale-up.
Evaluation Methods:
We use descriptive statistics to report measures of reach, effectiveness, adoption, and implementation outcomes over time. Additionally, for reach and effectiveness, we use unadjusted chi-squared analyses to compare trends in proportions across early, mid, and late implementation periods.
Results:
Over time, there was a trend toward increasing provider referrals (73 by year 3), new patient enrollments (362 in year 3), and RPM codes billed (1579 by year 3). Payor mix, a measure of program reach, saw a statistically significant improvement over time (P < 0.01), while the proportion of patients achieving target BP improved but was not statistically significant (P = 0.53).
Conclusion:
Multilevel alignment and continuous adaptation efforts contributed to successful implementation of a pharmacist-led RPM intervention for hypertension with improvement in reach over time. We share our insights as a resource for primary care practitioners, organizations, and policy makers seeking to implement RPM for hypertension.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Alterations in Blood Pressure
Hypertension (High blood pressure)
Hypertension occurs when blood pressure readings consistently exceed the normal range. It is diagnosed when systolic blood pressure (the top number, indicating pressure while the heart...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

