Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Biological Aging and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Systemic
Suguru Kojima1, Yusuke Inoue1, Masato Karayama2
1Second Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Biological age, not chronological age, predicts survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Biological age acceleration (BioAgeAccel) offers additional prognostic value, especially with immunotherapy, improving patient stratification for personalized treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biomarkers
- Aging Research
Background:
- Chronological age is insufficient for predicting outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Biological age (BioAge), derived from clinical biomarkers, may provide superior prognostic information.
- Individual variability in health status and treatment response necessitates advanced predictive markers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic value of Biological Age (BioAge) and BioAge acceleration (BioAgeAccel) in advanced NSCLC patients.
- To compare the predictive power of BioAge and chronological age for overall survival (OS).
- To assess the association of BioAge and BioAgeAccel with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 138 patients on ICIs and 154 chemotherapy-naïve patients.
- BioAge calculated using chronological age and seven clinical biomarkers; BioAgeAccel defined as residual from BioAge/chronological age regression.
- Survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models; competing risk regression for irAEs.
Main Results:
- Higher BioAge independently predicted shorter OS in both ICI and chemotherapy cohorts, unlike chronological age.
- Biologically older patients had significantly worse OS in the ICI cohort.
- BioAgeAccel was an independent prognostic factor for OS in the ICI cohort but not in the chemotherapy cohort.
- No significant associations found between BioAge, BioAgeAccel, chronological age, and irAE risk.
Conclusions:
- Biological age is a robust prognostic factor for advanced NSCLC.
- BioAgeAccel provides additional prognostic value, particularly for patients undergoing immunotherapy.
- Integrating biological age metrics can enhance patient stratification and guide individualized treatment strategies in NSCLC.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Absorption
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
