Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Reference values for the PROMIS® physical function item bank version 2.0 in the general population: a multinational
Jiseon Lee1,2, Danbee Kang1,2, Yeonjung Lim1,2
1Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Korean adults report higher physical function (PF) scores than US and Netherlands populations. Establishing country-specific PF reference values is recommended due to cultural differences.
Area of Science:
- Health Outcomes Research
- Cross-Cultural Health Assessment
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) item bank v2.0 is a key tool for assessing physical function.
- General population-based reference values are crucial for interpreting PROMIS PF scores accurately.
- Previous reference values were primarily established in Western populations, necessitating validation in diverse global populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish general population-based Korean reference values for the PROMIS PF item bank v2.0.
- To compare Korean PF reference values with those from the US and Netherlands.
- To identify potential cultural or demographic factors influencing PF scores across populations.
Main Methods:
- A representative sample of 2,124 Korean adults was surveyed using the PROMIS PF item bank in April 2021.
- Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare mean T-scores across age groups, sexes, comorbidity status, and general health.
- Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were conducted to compare item performance between the US and Korean populations.
Main Results:
- The mean Korean PF T-score was 55.3 (SD=9.1), significantly higher than the US (50.0) and Netherlands (49.8) general populations.
- Differences in PF scores were observed across various age and sex groups.
- Fifty-seven of 131 items showed uniform or nonuniform DIF between the US and Korean populations, indicating potential cross-cultural measurement invariance issues.
Conclusions:
- Korean adults exhibit higher PROMIS PF scores compared to US and Netherlands populations.
- Significant DIF was detected for a substantial number of items, highlighting the need for culturally adapted scoring.
- Establishing country-specific reference values for PROMIS PF is recommended globally to ensure accurate interpretation and application.
More Related Videos
09:19Community-based Adapted Tango Dancing for Individuals with Parkinson's Disease and Older Adults
Published on: December 9, 2014
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024