Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.7K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.7K
Dark Triad and Person Perception01:29

Dark Triad and Person Perception

257
Person perception is influenced by both external behaviors and the observer’s internal characteristics, including personality traits. Individuals with dark personality traits, comprising psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism — collectively known as the dark triad – exhibit manipulative and exploitative tendencies in social contexts. These traits affect how they perceive others and how they are perceived.The Role of Dark Personality Traits in Person PerceptionBlack et...
257
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

2.6K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.6K
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction01:21

Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction

210
Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal attraction, influencing first impressions, social interactions, and long-term relationship dynamics. Psychological research consistently demonstrates that attractiveness affects social evaluations and behavioral outcomes in various contexts.Influence on Social InteractionsResearch has shown that individuals perceived as physically attractive often experience preferential treatment in social and professional settings. One...
210
Factors Influencing Attraction VI: Personality Traits01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction VI: Personality Traits

197
Personality traits are fundamental in shaping social perception and influencing interpersonal relationships. Certain traits, such as agreeableness and extraversion, contribute positively to social interactions, whereas others, such as narcissism, have complex and often contradictory effects on how individuals are perceived over time.The Role of Agreeableness and ExtraversionAgreeableness and extraversion are associated with higher levels of interpersonal attractiveness and likability.
197
The Looking Glass Self01:28

The Looking Glass Self

279
The concept of the looking-glass self describes how an individual's self-concept is shaped by their perception of how others see them. This psychological theory, first introduced by sociologist Charles Horton Cooley in 1902, posits that self-identity emerges in a social context and is influenced by the judgments—real or imagined—of others.Research suggests that individuals frequently overestimate how positively others perceive them. This is particularly evident in physical...
279

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Stimulus sampling reimagined: Designing experiments with mix-and-match, analyzing results with stimulus plots.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

Ethical acceptability of human challenge trials: Consultation with the US public and with research personnel.

PloS one·2024
Same author

In masks we trust: explicit and implicit reactions to masked faces vary by political orientation.

BMC psychology·2024
Same author

Author Correction: A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Nature human behaviour·2022
Same author

Publisher Correction: Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample.

Nature human behaviour·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.8K

Does Maximizing Good Make People Look Bad?

Andres Montealegre1, Lance S Bush2, David Moss3

  • 1Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|November 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People avoid donating effectively due to reputational concerns. Focusing on empathy over charity cost-effectiveness is socially rewarded, leading to less impactful giving.

Keywords:
altruismempathyhelping/pro-social behaviormoralitysocial judgment

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.8K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Charitable Giving

Background:

  • Donors often do not prioritize charity cost-effectiveness, reducing donation impact.
  • Reputational concerns may influence donation decisions, overriding effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate why individuals neglect charity cost-effectiveness in donations.
  • To examine the role of social signaling and reputational concerns in charitable giving.

Main Methods:

  • Seven empirical studies were conducted.
  • Participants' perceptions of "deliberators" versus "empathizers" were assessed.
  • Donation choices were analyzed under varying reputational concerns.

Main Results:

  • Individuals prioritizing cost-effectiveness ("deliberators") were perceived as less moral and desirable social partners than "empathizers."
  • Anticipated reputational costs discouraged deliberation.
  • Reputational concerns led to donations favoring empathy over cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Social rewards for signaling moral traits disincentivize prioritizing charitable impact.
  • Reputational concerns create barriers to effective altruism through cost-effective charity selection.