Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.6K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

13.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
13.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

50.0K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
50.0K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.3K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.3K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

388
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
388

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Roles of miR-200 family members in lung cancer: more than tumor suppressors.

Future oncology (London, England)·2018
Same author

Alterations and structural resilience of the gut microbiota under dietary fat perturbations.

The Journal of nutritional biochemistry·2018
Same author

Development and Feasibility Testing of an mHealth (Text Message and WeChat) Intervention to Improve the Medication Adherence and Quality of Life of People Living with HIV in China: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth·2018
Same author

Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies of Fibrinolytic Therapy for Acute Lung Injury.

Frontiers in immunology·2018
Same author

Corrigendum to: The calcium sensor TaCBL4 and its interacting protein TaCIPK5 are required for wheat resistance to stripe rust fungus.

Journal of experimental botany·2018
Same author

Transcriptome analysis of Valsa mali reveals its response mechanism to the biocontrol actinomycete Saccharothrix yanglingensis Hhs.015.

BMC microbiology·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging
14:25

Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging

Published on: March 6, 2013

17.1K

Modeling the measurement precision of a multi-camera system.

Zhuoyi Yin, Yuanqiang Chen, Peiyun She

    Optics Letters
    |November 4, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a new measurement precision model for multi-camera systems. The model helps optimize camera setup for better performance and spatial accuracy.

    Area of Science:

    • Optics and Photonics
    • Computer Vision
    • Robotics

    Background:

    • Multi-camera systems offer high interference resistance and spatial precision.
    • Current research lacks a systematic framework for evaluating key configuration parameters.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a measurement precision model for multi-camera systems.
    • To provide a framework for evaluating configuration parameters like camera number, angular distribution, and baseline settings.

    Main Methods:

    • A measurement precision model based on error analysis theory was developed.
    • The model enables efficient estimation of system performance.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed model effectively estimates the performance of multi-camera configurations.

    More Related Videos

    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
    09:36

    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

    Published on: June 4, 2020

    3.5K
    Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
    08:16

    Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

    Published on: January 17, 2013

    13.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

    Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging
    14:25

    Determining 3D Flow Fields via Multi-camera Light Field Imaging

    Published on: March 6, 2013

    17.1K
    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
    09:36

    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

    Published on: June 4, 2020

    3.5K
    Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
    08:16

    Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

    Published on: January 17, 2013

    13.7K
  • Experimental validation confirmed the model's speed, reliability, and practicality.

    • Conclusions:

    • The developed model serves as a practical reference for designing and optimizing multi-camera systems.
    • It aids in informed hardware selection and spatial arrangement decisions.