Debunking "When Prophecy Fails"
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.A 1950s cult study
Area Of Science
- Psychology
- Sociology
Background
- The 1956 book "When Prophecy Fails" is a seminal study on cognitive dissonance.
- It describes a UFO cult led by Dorothy Martin that supposedly doubled down on beliefs after a failed prophecy.
Purpose Of The Study
- To re-examine the claims of "When Prophecy Fails" using newly unsealed archival materials.
- To investigate the accuracy of the book's central arguments regarding cognitive dissonance and researcher conduct.
Main Methods
- Analysis of newly discovered archival documents related to the 1954 UFO cult.
- Historical research and critical examination of the original study's methodology and findings.
Main Results
- The study's central claims are false; the group did not double down but dissolved after the failed prophecy.
- Researchers fabricated evidence, manipulated participants, and interfered with a child welfare case.
- The book "When Prophecy Fails" misrepresented the cult's behavior and the study's ethical conduct.
Conclusions
- The canonical account of cognitive dissonance in "When Prophecy Fails" is based on fabricated data.
- The study involved severe ethical violations by researchers, including Henry Riecken.
- This re-evaluation necessitates a revision of the understanding of this key psychological case study.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
This text is adapted from OpenStax, Psychology. OpenStax...
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Another...
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...