Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Using Micro-computed Tomography for the Assessment of Tumor Development and Follow-up of Response to Treatment in a Mouse Model of Lung Cancer
Published on: May 20, 2016
Efficient Workflows for Quantifying Tumor Growth on H&E-Stained Digital Sections in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Arisachi Tanaka1, Liping Zeng1, Zahra Malakoutikhah1
1Division of Rheumatology, Autoimmunity, and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
None:
Microscopic examination of tissue morphology using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining is a standard practice in histopathology for analyzing tissue specimens. In preclinical models of cancer, H&E-stained tissue sections are routinely used to assess tumor development and progression, including parameters such as tumor number, size, and histopathological features. Recent advances in whole-slide scanning and digital pathology now enable quantitative analysis of high-resolution digital images on a computer, replacing the need to examine physical tissue slides under a microscope. However, quantifying tumors on H&E-stained digital sections remains challenging, highlighting the need for accessible and reproducible methods that can be adapted to diverse tumor models. Here, we present two efficient workflows using QuPath, an open-source software for digital pathology and whole-slide image analysis, to quantify tumor multiplicity (i.e., the number of tumors) and tumor burden (e.g., tumor surface area) based on digitally captured H&E-stained tissue sections. As a proof of concept, we apply these workflows to two distinct lung cancer models: (1) an orthotopic model in which Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells are delivered intranasally or intravenously into syngeneic C57BL/6 mice, resulting in well-separated, easily distinguishable tumors amenable to manual quantification; and (2) a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) with lung-specific expression of oncogenic KrasG12D, characterized by infiltrative tumors that are less clearly demarcated due to integration with stromal and immune components, making them more suitable for semi-automated analysis. These Basic Protocols provide accessible and reproducible methods for quantifying tumor development that can be adapted to diverse cancer models. © 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Quantification of tumor multiplicity and tumor burden using a manual method Basic Protocol 2: Quantification of tumor burden using a semi-automated method.
More Related Videos
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
08:32Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
Published on: October 2, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging