Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

07:15
A Mouse Model of Incompletely Resected Soft Tissue Sarcoma for Testing Neoadjuvant Therapies
Published on: July 28, 2020
10.2K
Real-World Trends and Outcomes for Localized High-Grade Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Insights from a Sarcoma Unit in
Adel Shahnam1, Jeremy Lewin1,2, Anne Hamilton1,2
1Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
|November 4, 2025
Summary
Treatment patterns for localized soft tissue sarcomas evolved, but changes in radiation and systemic therapy did not impact relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS). Prognostic factors like tumor size and FDG-PET SUVmax require further study.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
Background:
- Localized soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare cancers requiring multimodal treatment.
- Treatment patterns for STSs have evolved, influenced by emerging evidence and technological advancements.
- Understanding temporal trends in STS treatment is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate temporal trends in treatment modalities for localized soft tissue sarcomas (STSs).
- To identify factors influencing relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in STS patients.
- To assess the impact of changing treatment practices on patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study utilizing the Australian Comprehensive Cancer Outcomes and Research Database (ACCORD) and electronic health records.
- Inclusion criteria: patients aged ≥18 years with grade 3, localized STS ≥5 cm diagnosed between 2013 and 2023.
- Analysis included Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models to assess RFS and OS, comparing two treatment periods (2013-2017 and 2018-2023).
Main Results:
- Radiation use decreased (79% vs. 64%, p=0.03) and systemic therapy use trended towards increase (8% vs. 16%, p=0.13) in the later period.
- No significant differences in median RFS (19 months) or OS (48 months) were observed between the two periods.
- Radiotherapy improved RFS (HR 0.69, p=0.04) but not OS. Systemic therapy showed no survival benefit. Age, tumor size, FDG-PET SUVmax, site, and Sarculator risk were prognostic factors.
Conclusions:
- Treatment patterns for localized STSs have evolved, but current changes have not yet translated into significant improvements in RFS or OS.
- Radiotherapy remains a significant factor for improving RFS in localized STSs.
- Further research into prognostic factors, including FDG-PET SUVmax, is warranted to refine treatment strategies.

