Trialblazer: A chemistry-focused predictor of toxicity risks in late-stage drug development

Huanni Zhang1, Matthias Welsch1, William Schueller2

  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria; Christian Doppler Laboratory for Molecular Informatics in the Biosciences, Department for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria; Vienna Doctoral School of Pharmaceutical, Nutritional and Sport Sciences (PhaNuSpo), University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.

Insights

Drug discovery faces challenges from late-stage toxicity failures. A new predictive model, Trialblazer, uses molecular data to identify potential toxicity risks early, aiding drug development and safety assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Drug development is frequently hindered by late-stage adverse effects, leading to significant financial and time losses.
  • Limited public data and predictive tools exist for identifying late-stage toxicity, posing a major challenge in pharmaceutical research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a predictive model for identifying drug candidates with potential toxicity.
  • To create a publicly accessible tool that aids in early-stage toxicity risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Compiled a dataset of 1603 benign drugs and 238 toxic drug candidates.
  • Developed and trained multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifiers using Morgan fingerprints and predicted bioactivity profiles.
  • Validated the best model, Trialblazer, using cross-validation and external pharmacovigilance data from the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Main Results:

  • The Trialblazer model achieved a cross-validation ROC-AUC of 0.87 and MCC of 0.47.
  • The model successfully distinguished drugs based on their safety profiles when applied to external data.
  • Predictions from Trialblazer can serve as an indicator for potential toxicity risks.

Conclusions:

  • The Trialblazer model offers a valuable tool for flagging compounds with a higher risk of toxicity during drug development.
  • The model's ability to predict toxicity without target information makes it suitable for novel compounds.
  • While useful, Trialblazer should complement, not replace, existing safety assessment methods.

Related Concept Videos

Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
5.8K
Drug Discovery: Overview01:26

Drug Discovery: Overview

Drug discovery is a multifaceted process involving extensive screening, testing, and optimization of lead compounds to identify potential new drugs for therapeutic use. It combines several approaches, including screening large numbers of natural products, chemical modification of known active molecules, identification of new drug targets, and rational design based on biological mechanisms and drug-receptor structure. These approaches are carried out in both academic research laboratories and...
10.9K
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.9K
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test01:22

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test

In clinical practice, the direct measurement of hepatic blood flow to evaluate liver function presents significant challenges due to the intricate and specialized nature of the necessary techniques. Consequently, healthcare professionals often rely on empirical estimates derived from thorough patient examinations and liver function tests to gauge liver health. Among the tools at their disposal, the Child–Pugh and MELD scoring systems stand out for their ability to categorize and assess...
176
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation01:20

Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation

In pharmaceutical development, it's crucial to establish a predictive in vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for two or more formulations to gain a comprehensive understanding of release properties. IVIVC reduces the need for costly in vivo studies and facilitates the establishment of meaningful dissolution specifications with significant cost savings and decreased regulatory burden. Furthermore, a meaningful IVIVC should predict Cmax and AUC within 20%, aligning with FDA guidance while...
224
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
395