Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Proteomics01:33

Proteomics

9.3K
A proteome is the entire set of proteins that a cell type produces. We can study proteomes using the knowledge of genomes because genes code for mRNAs, and the mRNAs encode proteins. Although mRNA analysis is a step in the right direction, not all mRNAs are translated into proteins.
Proteomics is the study of proteomes' function. It involves the large-scale systematic study of the proteome to denote the protein complement expressed by a genome. Scientist Mark Wilkins coined the term...
9.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Peptide Sorting by Embedding a Position-Controlled Gold Nanoparticle into the CNT/Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> Hybrid System with Double Misaligned Nanopores.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Giant and broadband circular dichroism from particle-hole symmetry breaking in Weyl semimetals.

Nature materials·2026
Same author

Steering moderated intermediate adsorption and lattice oxygen activation via Ce and B co-doped CuCo catalysts for efficient dual-pathway oxygen evolution and Zn-air batteries.

Journal of colloid and interface science·2026
Same author

MRI-based deep learning combined with radiomics for the preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in patients with bladder cancer.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2026
Same author

IR-WSANet: A lightweight network with frequency-spatial joint optimization for infrared small target detection.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Establishment of an efficient and reliable Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation system for the elite male-sterile poplar 'Siyang-1'.

BMC plant biology·2026
Same journal

Interplay between oxygen redox and interfacial stability of Li-rich positive electrodes in sulfide-based all-solid-state batteries.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Breaking dependence on melanisation imparts diversity to a dogmatic invasion strategy of phytopathogenic fungi.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Hydroxyl-rich nanocavities on perovskite enable nearly barrierless intramolecular hydrogen transfer for nitrate electroreduction to ammonia.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Household mobility responses to weather extremes in Kyrgyzstan.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Autonomous Motion Vision with Tri-bulk-heterojunctioned Organic Adaptation Transistor.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Tissue-adhesive hydrogel optical fiber for peripheral optogenetic neuromodulation.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools
07:01

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools

Published on: August 19, 2025

799

Protein-level batch-effect correction enhances robustness in MS-based proteomics.

Qiaochu Chen1, Zehui Cao1, Yaqing Liu1

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Genetics and Development of Complex Phenotypes, Human Phenome Institute and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Nature Communications
|November 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Batch effect correction in proteomics is crucial. Protein-level correction is most robust, enhancing data integration for large studies, especially when combined with quantification methods like MaxLFQ-Ratio.

More Related Videos

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.6K
High-Resolution Complexome Profiling by Cryoslicing BN-MS Analysis
09:33

High-Resolution Complexome Profiling by Cryoslicing BN-MS Analysis

Published on: October 15, 2019

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools
07:01

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools

Published on: August 19, 2025

799
Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

12.6K
High-Resolution Complexome Profiling by Cryoslicing BN-MS Analysis
09:33

High-Resolution Complexome Profiling by Cryoslicing BN-MS Analysis

Published on: October 15, 2019

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is susceptible to batch effects, which are technical variations impacting protein quantification.
  • The optimal stage for applying batch-effect correction in proteomics workflows is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark batch-effect correction strategies at different data levels (precursor, peptide, protein) in MS-based proteomics.
  • To evaluate the impact of quantification methods and correction algorithms on multi-batch data integration.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized real-world (Quartet reference materials) and simulated multi-batch proteomics data.
  • Compared seven batch-effect correction algorithms across three quantification methods (MaxLFQ, TopPep3, iBAQ).
  • Assessed correction performance in balanced and confounded experimental designs.

Main Results:

  • Protein-level batch-effect correction demonstrated the highest robustness across tested scenarios.
  • Quantification methods significantly interact with the performance of batch-effect correction algorithms.
  • The MaxLFQ-Ratio combination showed superior prediction performance in large-scale clinical trial data.

Conclusions:

  • Batch-effect correction at the protein level is recommended for robust multi-batch proteomics data integration.
  • The choice of quantification method influences the effectiveness of batch-effect correction strategies.
  • Optimized batch-effect correction enhances the utility of large-scale proteomics cohorts in clinical research.