Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
A novel framework to assess the prevention value of a health intervention
Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard1,2, Catrin Treharne1, Robert King1
1Health Analytics, Lane Clark & Peacock LLP, London, UK.
Aims:
Interest in capturing chronic disease prevention impacts on broader economic and societal outcomes is growing; however, this has been challenging to date. We present a comprehensive framework to support assessment of prevention value from a range of stakeholder perspectives, using obesity as an illustrative example.
Materials And Methods:
We identified three domains in which to group value components: individual health/health system, societal, and government. Longlisting and shortlisting of value components was supported by a targeted literature review, quality assessment against four criteria and review by six health economic and policy experts. Worked examples illustrate the applicability of the framework using two UK-based hypothetical intervention effects: a 5% obesity incidence reduction and a 0.5-unit improvement in SF-12 scores.
Results:
Twenty-nine value components were identified: 7 related to individual health/healthcare system, 18 to societal and 4 to government value. Of these, 17 were shortlisted into 9 categories: individual health, healthcare system, productivity, family impact, health equity and social mobility, environmental, income-related benefits, sickness benefits, and income tax. We also identified six components for future consideration, where current data and methodologies are limited.
Conclusions:
We propose a value framework that goes beyond traditional health benefit measures to holistically assess chronic disease prevention value. While data limitations prevented the quantification of all shortlisted components, this does not preclude a qualitative discussion of these components in evaluating a preventative intervention. The framework should now be tested with live interventions and key stakeholders to standardise methodologies and enhance future acceptability and use.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...