Decrease in dose per fraction impairs the FLASH sparing effect in murine intestine model.
A Sesink1, R Geyer2, P Devanand1
1Service of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Summary
FLASH radiotherapy shows significant sparing of normal tissues in single doses. However, this protective effect diminishes with fractionated regimens, disappearing entirely with ten fractions, suggesting limited benefits at lower doses per fraction.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Preclinical Research
- Radiobiology
Background:
- Conventional radiotherapy (CONV) poses risks of normal tissue toxicity.
- Ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH) shows promise in sparing normal tissues.
- The efficacy of FLASH in clinically relevant fractionation schedules requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the normal tissue sparing effect of FLASH radiotherapy across different fractionation protocols.
- To evaluate FLASH's benefit in a murine model of acute gastrointestinal toxicity.
- To determine the dose modifying factor (DMF) for FLASH under various fractionation schemes.
Main Methods:
- C57BL/6 mice underwent abdominal irradiation using either CONV or FLASH (9 MeV electron beam).
- Three protocols were tested: single fraction, two equal fractions over two days, and ten daily fractions over two weeks.
- Dose escalation was performed, and overall survival monitored normal tissue sparing; DMF was calculated from NTCP curves.
Main Results:
- Single-fraction FLASH demonstrated significant sparing (mean DMF = 1.14).
- The two-fraction regimen showed diminished sparing (mean DMF = 1.03).
- No significant sparing was observed with the ten-fraction regimen (mean DMF = 1.00).
Conclusions:
- FLASH radiotherapy's normal tissue sparing effect is reduced in fractionated protocols, particularly with higher fraction numbers.
- The benefit of FLASH may be dose-per-fraction dependent, with limited efficacy in hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated schedules.
- Further research is needed in diverse models to define FLASH's therapeutic applicability in clinical settings.


