Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Provider billing margin and cancer treatment selection: population based cohort study
Aaron P Mitchell1,2, Stacie B Dusetzina3, Akriti Mishra Meza4
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA mitchea2@mskcc.org.
Oncologists prioritize cancer treatment clinical benefit over profit margins. Study shows treatment selection aligns with patient benefit, not provider profit, suggesting policy changes targeting billing margins won't alter usage patterns.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Economics
- Clinical Decision Making
Background:
- Provider billing margins for cancer treatments vary significantly.
- Understanding factors influencing cancer treatment selection is crucial for patient care and healthcare policy.
- The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) provides evidence-based treatment guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between provider billing margins and clinical benefit of cancer treatments.
- To determine if billing margins influence oncologists' treatment choices.
- To assess the impact of clinical benefit on treatment utilization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, population-based cohort study using Medicare fee-for-service claims data (2015-2020).
- Included Medicare beneficiaries with incident cancer and treatment options with varying clinical benefit and billing margins.
- Used conditional logit models with inverse probability-of-treatment weights to analyze treatment selection based on NCCN recommendations, billing margin, and Evidence Blocks scores.
Main Results:
- Examined 12 cancer indications and 19,397 patients.
- Provider billing margin per treatment course ranged from $0 to $12,692.
- No association was found between increased billing margin and treatment use (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.03).
- Higher clinical benefit was significantly associated with increased treatment use (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.15-2.29).
Conclusions:
- Cancer treatment selection in Medicare beneficiaries is driven by clinical benefit, not provider billing margin.
- Policy or price changes affecting billing margins are unlikely to alter cancer treatment utilization patterns.
- Clinical benefit remains the primary determinant in oncologists' treatment decisions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

