Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026
Rectal Organoid Morphology Analysis ROMA: A Diagnostic Assay in Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: June 10, 2022
Beyond the Rome IV criteria: Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tools for functional constipation in children and
Glicia Estevam de Abreu1, Clara Nunes Pamponet1, Anderson Luiz Pimentel Ferreira1
1Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Centro de Distúrbios Miccionais na Infância, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Introduction:
Functional constipation (FC) is the most prevalent digestive complaint in children and adolescents, significantly impacting quality of life and often associated with fecal incontinence, emotional disturbances, and urinary symptoms. Although its diagnosis is primarily clinical and based on the Rome IV criteria, the lack of objective severity parameters and reliance on self-reported symptoms can hinder early identification. In this context, the present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used auxiliary tools - the pediatric-adapted Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCS), the Bristol Stool Scale, the Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS), and rectal diameter (RD) - using the Rome IV criteria as the gold standard.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study included 106 patients aged 4-17 years, evaluated in general pediatric and specialized lower urinary tract dysfunction outpatient clinics. Each assessment tool was compared against the Rome IV criteria in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy.
Results:
The CCS demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (92.1 %), with a sensitivity of 89.5 % and specificity of 80.0 %, establishing it as an effective tool not only for diagnosing FC but also for grading its severity. Item 4 of the DVSS, which assesses the perception of effort during defecation, showed an accuracy of 72.5 % and should be valued by healthcare professionals as a relevant marker of FC. In contrast, the Bristol Stool Scale (types 1 and 2), RD measurement, and DVSS item 3 (bowel movement frequency) presented low accuracy levels (<60 %).
Conclusion:
With its high accuracy, the CCS has proven to be a valid and reliable tool that supports the diagnosis of functional constipation and may also assist in determining its severity. Additionally, DVSS item 4 proves useful in clinical evaluation, while other instruments should be considered auxiliary tools, applied selectively based on individual patient needs.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
01:25Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
01:26Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
01:21Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
01:30Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
01:30Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test