Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chemotaxis and Direction of Cell Migration01:21

Chemotaxis and Direction of Cell Migration

4.3K
Cells can detect chemical cues in their environment and reorganize the cytoskeleton to migrate toward them or away from them. This directional migration, called chemotaxis, is essential during embryogenesis and development, immune response, tissue repair and regeneration, and reproduction. These chemical cues can either attract or repel the cell's movement. For example, axon development is determined by a combination of chemoattractants and chemorepellents that direct the growing axon...
4.3K
Chemotaxis in E. coli01:27

Chemotaxis in E. coli

663
Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli is a sensory-driven motility mechanism that enables bacteria to navigate chemical gradients, moving toward beneficial environments while avoiding harmful conditions. This process relies on a signal transduction system integrating external chemical cues with flagellar motor control.Chemoreceptors and Signal DetectionE. coli detects chemical gradients through methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), which are membrane-bound chemoreceptors that sense attractants...
663
Actin Treadmilling01:18

Actin Treadmilling

9.5K
Actin filaments undergo polymerization and depolymerization from either end. The polymerization and depolymerization rates depend on the cytosolic concentration of free G-actins. The polymerization rate is generally higher at the plus or barbed end, while the depolymerization rate is higher at the minus or pointed end. At a steady state, critical concentration describes the concentration of free G-actin monomers at which the polymerization rate at the plus end is equal to that of the...
9.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantitative evaluation of methods to analyze motion changes in single-particle experiments.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Unraveling the Influence of Topology and Spatial Confinement on Equilibrium and Relaxation Properties of Interlocked Ring Polymers.

Macromolecules·2024
Same author

Learning how to find targets in the micro-world: the case of intermittent active Brownian particles.

Soft matter·2024
Same author

Geometric Predictors of Knotted and Linked Arcs.

ACS polymers Au·2022
Same author

Correction to "Topologically Linked Chains in Confinement″.

ACS macro letters·2022
Same author

Topologically Linked Chains in Confinement.

ACS macro letters·2022
Same journal

Nanopore sequencing with proteins: synchronization and dischronization of molecular dynamics simulations with laboratory and industrial developments.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Catanionics from biosurfactants and regular surfactants: miscibility and structure.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Adhesives with a thickness smaller than the fractocohesive length enhance adhesion.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Non-equilibrium phase transitions in hybrid Voronoi models of cell colonies.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Effects of methoxy substituents on self-assembly and gelation performance of benzamide-based organogelators.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Rheology of <i>Escherichia coli</i> suspensions with various bacterial morphologies and motion characteristics.

Soft matter·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

C. elegans Chemotaxis Assay
06:28

C. elegans Chemotaxis Assay

Published on: April 27, 2013

47.6K

Run-and-tumble particles learning chemotaxis.

Nicholas Tovazzi1,2, Gorka Muñoz-Gil2, Michele Caraglio2

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica, Dipartimento di Fisica, via Sommarive 14, 38123 Trento, Italy.

Soft Matter
|November 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bacteria use chemotaxis for finding food. Machine learning reveals that agents with memory-based temporal comparisons learn efficient strategies for target search, especially from afar.

More Related Videos

Generating Controlled, Dynamic Chemical Landscapes to Study Microbial Behavior
10:07

Generating Controlled, Dynamic Chemical Landscapes to Study Microbial Behavior

Published on: January 31, 2020

6.6K
Measuring Associative Learning in Chemotaxis of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
09:53

Measuring Associative Learning in Chemotaxis of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: June 17, 2025

534

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

C. elegans Chemotaxis Assay
06:28

C. elegans Chemotaxis Assay

Published on: April 27, 2013

47.6K
Generating Controlled, Dynamic Chemical Landscapes to Study Microbial Behavior
10:07

Generating Controlled, Dynamic Chemical Landscapes to Study Microbial Behavior

Published on: January 31, 2020

6.6K
Measuring Associative Learning in Chemotaxis of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
09:53

Measuring Associative Learning in Chemotaxis of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: June 17, 2025

534

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Computational Biology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Bacteria evolve chemotaxis for nutrient seeking.
  • Chemotactic motion involves run-and-tumble dynamics.
  • Understanding emergent search strategies is key.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate learning of chemotactic strategies via machine learning.
  • Analyze intermittent search behavior in bacteria-like agents.
  • Compare learning efficiency based on sensory input and memory.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated run-and-tumble agents with tunable switching probabilities.
  • Agents navigate environments with chemical concentration gradients.
  • Machine learning models trained on instantaneous concentration vs. temporal comparison.

Main Results:

  • All learning agents developed effective target-search policies.
  • Agents with temporal comparison abilities showed significantly higher efficiency.
  • Efficiency gains were most pronounced for agents starting farther from the target.
  • Agents leveraged imposed length scales (e.g., initial distance) to enhance search.

Conclusions:

  • Temporal comparison abilities significantly enhance chemotactic search efficiency.
  • Intermittent search agents can learn sophisticated strategies.
  • Environmental information, like distance, can be exploited for optimized navigation.