Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Real-World Effectiveness of Switching to Oral or Infusion Versus Injectable Disease-Modifying Therapy in Pediatric
Aaron W Abrams1, Michael Waltz2, T Charles Casper2
1Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Insights
Switching pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) patients from injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) to oral or infusion treatments significantly reduced relapse rates. These findings highlight improved disease control with newer DMT classes in young MS patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Neuroimmunology
- Clinical Therapeutics
Background:
- Platform injectable therapies are common initial treatments for pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).
- Assessing the effectiveness of switching disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in pediatric MS patients.
- Real-world data on switching DMTs in this population are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of switching from initial platform injectable DMTs to other DMT classes (injectable, oral, or infusion) in pediatric MS and CIS patients.
- To compare disease activity, specifically relapse rates, among different DMT switching strategies.
- To provide evidence-based insights for clinical decision-making in managing pediatric MS.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 2615 pediatric-onset demyelinating disease patients from the US Network of Pediatric MS Centers.
- Included patients with MS/CIS initially treated with platform injectables who switched to injectable, oral, or infusion DMTs.
- Negative binomial regression was used to model relapse rates, adjusting for confounders.
Main Results:
- Of 212 children who switched DMT, 76 switched to oral and 43 to infusion therapies.
- Switching to oral or infusion DMTs was associated with significantly lower annualized relapse rates (ARR) compared to remaining on injectables (0.34 and 0.18 vs. 0.88, respectively).
- The number needed to treat to prevent one relapse was substantially lower for oral (1.84) and infusion (1.43) switches compared to injectable-to-injectable switches.
Conclusions:
- Switching from platform injectable DMTs to oral or infusion therapies demonstrates superior disease control in pediatric MS and CIS patients.
- These findings support the use of oral or infusion DMTs for improved outcomes in pediatric MS.
- Further research on the long-term safety and efficacy of these switches is warranted.
Objective:
To assess real-world effectiveness of switching disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) initially treated with platform injectables on disease activity.
Methods:
Of 2615 pediatric-onset demyelinating disease patients at 12 clinics in the United States (US) Network of Pediatric MS Centers, those with MS/CIS on initial therapy with a platform injectable who switched to another class of platform injectable, oral or infusion DMT were analyzed. Relapse rate was modeled with negative binomial regression, adjusted for preidentified confounders.
Results:
A total of 212 children switched DMT before age 18 (67% female, 95% MS). Ninety-three switched from injectable to injectable, 76 injectable to oral, and 43 injectable to infusion. Switchers to oral or infusion were older at onset (injectable 12.3 years, oral 13.5 years, and infusion 14.2 years) and switch (injectable 14.6 years, oral 16.0 years, and infusion 15.7 years). Switchers to infusion DMT were more likely to have enhancing lesions (injectable 45%, oral 28%, and infusion 67%). Compared to injectable (annualized relapse rate [ARR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-1.48), relapse rates were lower for injectable to oral (ARR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20-0.57; rate ratio: 0.38, 95% CI = 0.21-0.69) and injectable to infusion (ARR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09-0.37; rate ratio: 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10-0.44) (p < 0.001). Adjusted number needed to treat in person-years to prevent 1 relapse with oral over injectable was 1.84 (95% CI = 1.03-8.69) and infusion over injectable 1.43 (95% CI = 1.00-3.88).
Interpretation:
Switching from platform injectable to oral or infusion compared to other platform injectable DMT led to better disease control in pediatric MS. Long-term safety data are required. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:715-729.
More Related Videos
02:44Use of Micropipette-Guided Drug Administration as an Alternative Method to Oral Gavage in Rodent Models
Published on: July 26, 2024
09:38Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination
Published on: September 12, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children