The Optimal Method for Labor Induction in Macrosomic Fetuses: Mechanical or Medical?

Fetal macrosomia is a risk factor for operative vaginal delivery (VD), shoulder dystocia, obstructed labor, and cesarean section (CS). Induction of labor (IOL) may decrease these risks but also leads to longer labor, increasing the risk of CS. No data exist regarding the optimal method of IOL in macrosomic fetuses, and most studies are limited to the efficacy of medical induction.

To compare medical and mechanical IOL in macrocosmic fetuses.

This retrospective case-control study included pregnant women who underwent IOL and delivered macrosomic neonates at a tertiary center between 2010 and 2020. Women with non-cephalic presentation, prior CS, and multiple pregnancies were excluded. The primary outcome was the mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included neonatal and maternal complications.

A total of 247 women were included in the study, 188 underwent cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) regimens and 59 with a double-balloon catheter. Higher rates of prior deliveries over 4000 grams and Oxytocin use during delivery were found in the mechanical induction group. No other clinically significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were identified. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of VD or CS between the groups. The indications for CS were similar. Maternal and neonatal secondary outcomes were comparable.

PGE2 vaginal regimens and double catheter balloons are safe and effective methods for cervical ripening during IOL in term pregnancies with macrosomic neonates. The choice of cervical ripening method did not impact the mode of delivery or maternal and neonatal outcomes.