Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Editing02:23

RNA Editing

9.7K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
9.7K
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay02:27

Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay

11.7K
The Upf proteins that carry out nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) are found in all eukaryotic organisms, including humans. Each protein has an individual role, but they need to work in collaboration. Upf1 is an ATP-dependent RNA helicase that unwinds the RNA helix. Because Upf1 can unwind any RNA, Upf2 and Upf3 are required to help Upf1 discriminate between nonsense and normal mRNAs.
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
11.7K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.0K
Complementary DNA01:44

Complementary DNA

31.2K
Overview
31.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deciphering the <i>Nodamura virus</i> Protein A Function in <i>Schizosaccharomyces pombe</i> and Engineering a Novel Self-Amplifying RNA (saRNA) Vector NovaVec for Vaccine Development.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Boosting mRNA Therapeutics: pHLIP Enhances Endosomal Escape and Gene Expression in Lipid Nanoparticle.

Advanced healthcare materials·2025
Same author

mRNAdesigner: an integrated web server for optimizing mRNA design and protein translation in eukaryotes.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Cell-type deconvolution for bulk RNA-seq data using single-cell reference: a comparative analysis and recommendation guideline.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025
Same author

In vivo assembly of complete eukaryotic nucleosomes and (H3-H4)-only non-canonical nucleosomal particles in the model bacterium Escherichia coli.

Communications biology·2024
Same author

Creating a bacterium that forms eukaryotic nucleosome core particles.

Nature communications·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.9K

An ADAR2-mimic base editor for efficient C-to-U RNA editing in vivo.

Chenhui Hao1,2, Niubing Zhang1, Ouyang Mo3

  • 1Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, State Key Laboratory of Plant Trait Design, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|November 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary

A new RNA base editor, AMBER, effectively corrects pathogenic mutations with high efficiency in cells and mice. This cytosine-to-uridine editor shows promise for treating genetic diseases by precisely rewriting RNA sequences.

Keywords:
ADARC-to-U editingRNA editingcytosine deaminasegenetic mutation

More Related Videos

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e
07:31

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.6K
CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.
07:46

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

Published on: December 11, 2020

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.9K
Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e
07:31

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.6K
CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.
07:46

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

Published on: December 11, 2020

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetic Engineering
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • RNA base editing offers reversible and tunable genetic modification.
  • Cytosine-to-uridine editors face challenges with DNA mutagenicity and immunogenicity.
  • ADAR2-mimic base editor for C-to-U RNA editing (AMBER) was developed to overcome these limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel RNA base editor for efficient and safe C-to-U RNA editing.
  • To evaluate the performance and safety of AMBER in cellular and in vivo models.
  • To assess AMBER's potential for therapeutic applications in genetic diseases.

Main Methods:

  • Engineered ADAR2 into a cytosine deaminase using 17 mutant substitutions (RESCUE-S derived).
  • Tested AMBER's editing efficiency and specificity in various cell lines and in C57BL/6 mice.
  • Utilized RNA sequencing to analyze off-target effects and transcriptome-wide editing.

Main Results:

  • AMBER demonstrated robust C-to-U editing with efficiencies from 8% to 38% in cell lines.
  • Successfully corrected pathogenic mutations, including a phenylketonuria mouse model (19.7% efficiency).
  • Achieved ~21% on-target efficiency in vivo in mice, with sustained editing for up to 1 week and minimal off-target effects.

Conclusions:

  • AMBER is a potent RNA base editor for C-to-U conversion, overcoming limitations of previous editors.
  • AMBER shows significant potential as a therapeutic tool for correcting T-to-C mutations in genetic disorders.
  • The study highlights AMBER's safety and efficacy for in vivo applications in treating genetic diseases.