Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
Diagnostic COncordance in Aortic Regurgitation Severity AssessMent: A ComPARative Study Between Cardiologists With
Giacomo Maria Viani1, Hekuran Bytyci1, Vincenzo Viccaro1
1Department of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Insights
Vena contracta width (VCW) is the most reproducible echocardiographic measure for chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) offers superior reproducibility and should complement transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) when AR assessment is unclear.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Tools
Background:
- Accurate assessment of chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) using echocardiography presents challenges due to interobserver variability.
- Guideline-recommended echocardiographic parameters require evaluation for reproducibility in clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reproducibility of guideline-recommended echocardiographic parameters for chronic AR in real-world settings.
- To assess cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a complementary imaging modality for AR assessment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 99 patients with AR evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).
- A subset of 22 patients also underwent CMR.
- AR severity was graded using parameters like pressure half-time (PHT), vena contracta width (VCW), and regurgitant orifice area (EROA), with interobserver agreement assessed via Cohen's Kappa and Bland-Altman analysis.
Main Results:
- VCW demonstrated the highest reproducibility (overall κ=0.77) and feasibility (68.7%).
- PHT showed poor interobserver consistency (overall κ=0.36) with significant variability.
- EROA had moderate agreement (overall κ=0.55) but low feasibility (30.3%).
- CMR parameters exhibited excellent reproducibility, independent of reader expertise.
Conclusions:
- VCW is the most reliable echocardiographic parameter for AR assessment.
- PHT and EROA are limited by variability and feasibility, respectively.
- CMR offers superior reproducibility and should be considered early for inconclusive TTE findings in chronic AR management.
Purpose:
Accurate echocardiographic assessment of chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) is challenging and subject to interobserver variability. We aim to evaluate reproducibility of guideline-recommended echocardiographic parameters in real-world practice and to assess cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a complementary modality.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients referred to us for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for AR evaluation. A subset of 22 patients also underwent CMR. AR severity was independently graded according to ESC and ASE guidelines by two expert cardiologists and two trainees using semi-quantitative and quantitative parameters: pressure half-time (PHT), vena contracta width (VCW), and PISA-derived parameters, such as regurgitant orifice area (EROA). Interobserver agreement was analyzed using Cohen's Kappa, Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients.
Results:
VCW showed the highest reproducibility (overall κ = 0.77), strong agreement across groups (EXACT team κ = 0.7, TRAIN team κ = 0.86), and high feasibility (68.7%). PHT demonstrated poor interobserver consistency (overall κ = 0.36), wide intra-team variability (EXACT team κ = 0.30 vs. TRAIN team κ = 0.39), and high feasibility (77.8%). EROA showed moderate agreement (overall κ = 0.55, EXACT team κ = 0.64, TRAIN team κ = 0.74) and low feasibility (30.3%). CMR-derived parameters (forward flow, backflow, and regurgitant fraction) displayed excellent reproducibility even between novice and expert readers.
Conclusions:
VCW is the most reliable echocardiographic parameter for AR assessment, while PHT and EROA are limited by variability and feasibility, respectively. Given its reproducibility and independence from operator expertise, CMR should be considered early when TTE findings are inconclusive. A simplified TTE-first approach, followed by timely CMR, may optimize staging and management of chronic AR.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

