Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.3K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.3K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

564
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
564
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

340
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
340
Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

10.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
10.9K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.6K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.6K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

16.6K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experience sampling methods require more than numbers.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Comparing training window selection methods for prediction in non-stationary time series.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

Assessing the internal consistency reliability of ecological momentary assessment measures: Insights from the WARN-D study.

Psychological assessment·2025
Same author

An investigation into in-sample and out-of-sample model selection for nonstationary autoregressive models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2025
Same author

Predicting dropout in intensive longitudinal data: Extending the joint model for autocorrelated data.

Psychological assessment·2025
Same author

The many reliabilities of psychological dynamics: An overview of statistical approaches to estimate the internal consistency reliability of intensive longitudinal data.

Psychological methods·2025
Same journal

Modeling of parent-rated psychopathology in children and adolescents using the Child Behavior Checklist.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Racial differences in static and dynamic sexual risk assessment instruments: Static-99R and Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Maladaptive exercise: A psychometric investigation.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Depression and suicidal ideation and behavior measurement invariance: A comparison of foreign-born and U.S.-born service members.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal measurement invariance and psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS), and Positive Emotion Scale (PES) among community-dwelling adults.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Differential utility of immediate versus delayed memory measures for the identification of episodic memory impairment: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Psychological assessment·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.4K

Utilizing qualitative methods to detect validity issues in clinical experience sampling methodology (ESM).

Leonie Schorrlepp1, Marie Stadel2, Laura F Bringmann3

  • 1Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University.

Psychological Assessment
|November 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Qualitative methods enhance the validity of experience sampling methodology (ESM) studies by identifying and understanding participant interpretation issues. This approach complements quantitative data, improving the reliability of clinical assessments.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.0K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.4K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.0K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Experience sampling methodology (ESM) is increasingly used in clinical research for ecological validity.
  • Concerns exist regarding the validity of ESM due to participant interpretation challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the contribution of qualitative methods in detecting and understanding validity issues in ESM studies.
  • To provide practical guidance on implementing qualitative validity checks in ESM research.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing qualitative approaches such as focus groups, open-ended items, cognitive interviews, and semistructured interviews.
  • Translating existing qualitative methods for application in ESM research across various study stages.

Main Results:

  • Qualitative methods can effectively identify the occurrence and content of validity issues in ESM.
  • Examples from clinical ESM literature and mixed-methods studies illustrate the utility of these checks.

Conclusions:

  • Qualitative validity checks are crucial for ensuring the accuracy of ESM data in clinical research.
  • Encourages clinical researchers to integrate qualitative methods to improve ESM study conclusions.