Common genetic variation in the APOE gene and risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yousef A Barakji1, Nanna B Hupfeld2, Claus A Bertelsen3
1Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29, DK-3400, Hillerød, Denmark.
Background And Aims:
Already decades ago, apolipoprotein E (apoE) was suggested to be implemented in risk of cancer. The aim was to investigate the current evidence on the association between APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 carrier status and risk of cancer.
Methods:
This systematic review and meta-analysis performed per PRISMA guidelines included a search of PubMed and Embase (PROSPERO CRD42024498793). Studies had to report APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 genotype/allele status, and ε33, non-ε4 or non-ε2 served as reference groups.
Results:
Of 3189 screened records, we included 38 studies in the meta-analysis. For all cancer the risk increased from ε2 to ε3 to ε4 (P for trend: p = 0.01). For breast cancer ε4 was the risk allele (p = 0.03). The risk for colorectal cancer increased from ε2 to ε3 to ε4 (p for trend: p = 0.02). The Odds Ratio (OR) (95 % confidence interval (CI)) for colorectal cancer was 1.07 (1.00-1.13) for ε43 vs. ε33. For lung cancer the OR was 1.52 (1.04-2.2) for ε22 vs. ε33, and 2.80 (1.38-5.69) for ε4 vs. non-ε4. For the analyses for larynx and pharynx cancer, the OR was 0.72 (0.54-0.95) for ε2 vs. non-ε2.
Conclusions:
APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 genotype does not constitute a major risk factor for cancer. Effect sizes were overall small, and we did not find a clear pattern appearing throughout all cancer types with none of the comparisons (for individual alleles/genotypes) statistically significant for risk of all cancer. The study cannot exclude small but biologically interesting allele and genotype specific patterns for some cancer types with ε4 posing to be a risk factor and ε2 a protective factor.
More Related Videos
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
08:15gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair
Published on: October 6, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer Survival Analysis
