Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.5K
Temperature Measurement Sites01:14

Temperature Measurement Sites

3.1K
A thermometer measures body temperature. The common sites for measuring body temperature are the oral cavity, axillary region, temporal artery, and skin surface, such as the forehead, abdomen, and axilla. True core body temperature is assessed in the rectum, tympanic membrane, pulmonary artery, esophagus, and urinary bladder.
Oral: When assessing oral temperature, the thermometer tip should be placed under the tongue in the posterior sublingual pocket. It offers accurate readings and can be...
3.1K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

7.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
7.8K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

14.1K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
14.1K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acquisition and extinction of conditioned action tendencies in the motor cortex.

Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Mask contrast and size do not alter suppression depth in the tracking continuous flash suppression paradigm.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Breakthrough thresholds in continuous flash suppression are tuned to mask temporal frequency but suppression depth is constant.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

A minimal physiological model of perceptual suppression and breakthrough in visual rivalry.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Perception of audio-visual synchrony is modulated by walking speed and step-cycle phase.

Perception·2025
Same author

The Development of Audio-Tactile Spatial Integration: Unraveling Vision's Contribution.

Developmental science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.3K

Sensory reliability takes priority over the central tendency effect in temporal and spatial estimation.

Alessia Tonelli1,2, Cameron K Phan3, David Alais3

  • 1School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. alessia.tonelli@iit.it.

Scientific Reports
|November 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Perceptual estimates are influenced by sensory reliability, not a general central tendency. In multisensory contexts, the brain prioritizes the dominant sense, showing modality-specific priors over a generalized one.

Keywords:
Auditory perceptionCentral tendencySpatial perceptionTime perceptionVisual perception

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.3K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Perception relies on contextual cues to reduce sensory uncertainty.
  • The central tendency effect describes perceptual estimates shifting towards a stimulus mean, especially with unreliable input.
  • Multisensory integration's influence on this effect, particularly sensory dominance, is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether multisensory perception is guided by a generalized (supra-modal) prior or by modality-specific priors.
  • To determine if task-relevant sensory dominance influences the central tendency effect in audition and vision.
  • To model and explain the mechanisms of cross-modal perceptual estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed spatial and temporal estimation tasks in unimodal (auditory or visual) and interleaved multisensory sessions.
  • Bayesian modeling was applied to analyze perceptual estimates and test different prior models.
  • Comparison of estimates in unimodal baseline sessions versus interleaved multisensory sessions.

Main Results:

  • Perceptual estimates did not shift towards a supra-modal prior in multisensory settings.
  • Estimates for the dominant modality (vision for space, audition for time) remained stable.
  • Estimates for the non-dominant modality were biased towards the dominant modality's prior.
  • Bayesian models best fit modality-specific priors over supra-modal ones.

Conclusions:

  • Perceptual estimation prioritizes sensory reliability within specific modalities over a general central tendency.
  • The brain utilizes modality-specific priors, influenced by task-relevant sensory dominance, for multisensory integration.
  • Findings offer insights into how contextual information is integrated across senses, favoring reliable sensory channels.